
#1 2B · Braves
Height
5'7"
Weight
165 lbs
Age
29
College
N/A
Experience
9 yrs
Bats/Throws
B/R
Grade Ozzie Albies
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Ozzie Albies grades out as a middling 2B for Braves (C- Performance). That places him 49th of 72 graded second basemen. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C-, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1078 | 0.2661215 | 165 | 609 | 0.7742027 | 98 | 1139 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 63 | .279 | 10 | 34 | .779 | 0 | 68 |
| 2025 |
Length
7 years
Total Value
$35.0M
Guaranteed
$21.0M
AAV
$5.0M/yr
Ozzie Albies' WAR-tier baseline and counting stats together earn a C- performance grade. Through 63 games in the 2026 season, Albies is hitting .279 with 10 home runs and 31 strikeouts — a profile that reflects solid contact ability but insufficient power production and run-scoring to justify All-Star caliber status at second base. His batting average stands as his strongest metric; the strikeout total and modest homer count, however, reveal a player generating far less impact than the early-season narrative and managerial endorsement would suggest. Albies has logged meaningful playing time and maintained health, but the production gap between his pedigree as a two-time Silver Slugger and two-time All-MLB Second Team honoree and his current on-field output is stark enough that the sentiment grade meaningfully outpaces the performance grade — a tension that will only widen if the strikeout rate persists. The Braves' aggressive roster additions on the pitching side signal a front office in full win-now mode, which places real pressure on established veterans like Albies to elevate beyond this middling output. Moving forward, his franchise standing and the team's competitive window mean the goodwill from Opening Day heroics will eventually evaporate without sustained offensive production.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Ozzie's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Ozzie Albies ranks 49th of 72 graded second basemen by performance. That slots Ozzie between Nick Yorke (C) just ahead and Luisangel Acuna (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Nick YorkePiratesCJeff McNeilAthleticsCEdmundo SosaPhilliesCGraded lower
Luisangel AcunaWhite Sox| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 6/14 | @ NYM | L 1-8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs PIT | W 6-3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Ozzie Albies is a veteran in his 9th MLB season listed at 2B for the Braves. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Ozzie Albies, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance C-, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 157 |
| .240 |
| 16 |
| 74 |
| .671 |
| 14 |
| 145 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 99 | .251 | 10 | 53 | .707 | 8 | 100 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 148 | .280 | 33 | 109 | .849 | 13 | 167 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 64 | .247 | 8 | 35 | .703 | 3 | 61 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 156 | .259 | 30 | 106 | .798 | 20 | 163 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 29 | .271 | 6 | 19 | .772 | 3 | 32 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 160 | .295 | 24 | 86 | .852 | 15 | 189 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 158 | .261 | 24 | 72 | .757 | 14 | 167 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 57 | .286 | 6 | 28 | .810 | 8 | 62 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Fri, 6/5 | vs PIT | W 6-3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs TOR | L 2-7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs TOR | W 7-3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/2 | vs TOR | W 4-3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Sun, 5/31 | @ CIN | L 4-6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 5/30 | @ CIN | W 5-2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri, 5/29 | @ CIN | W 8-3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Thu, 5/28 | @ BOS | W 10-2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |