
#72 2B · Dodgers
Height
5'10"
Weight
188 lbs
Age
37
College
N/A
Experience
12 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Miguel Rojas
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Miguel Rojas grades out as a middling 2B for Dodgers (C+ Performance). That places him 33rd of 72 graded second basemen. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 12+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 39 | .258 | 1 | 9 | .650 | 0 | 23 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$5.5M
Guaranteed
$3.3M
AAV
$5.5M/yr
Miguel Rojas grades a C+ performance mark, with his All-Star caliber stretches anchoring the read. At 37 years old in his 13th professional season, he remains a solid-starter-tier contributor at second base—a veteran with enough remaining utility to hold down a roster spot on a competitive team, but no longer a centerpiece. His 2026 season stats (.258 AVG, 1 HR, 12 K across 39 games) paint the picture of a light-hitting, contact-oriented player whose main offensive asset is plate discipline and avoiding strikeouts, though the power has predictably dried up late in his career. The real constraint is durability and counting production; at this stage, his value accrues in small increments—the occasional extra-base hit, the timely at-bat in a stretch run, the veteran presence in the clubhouse. What elevates Rojas beyond a replacement-level veteran is the narrative context: his World Series heroics have burnished his standing as a fan favorite and cultural symbol of the Dodgers' championship pedigree, a status the front office seems happy to validate by building around him rather than over him during what appears to be his final campaign. The organization's recent flurry of signings—including catching depth and relief pitching—confirms he occupies a supporting role on a still-evolving roster, which aligns perfectly with his C+ grade: a dependable, respected elder statesman whose on-field contributions are modest but meaningful within the team's larger architecture.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Miguel's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Miguel Rojas ranks 33rd of 72 graded second basemen by performance. That slots Miguel between Gleyber Torres (B-) just ahead and Kody Clemens (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Gleyber TorresTigersB-Pedro RamirezCubsB-Bryson StottPhilliesC+Graded lower
Kody ClemensTwins| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | vs TB | W 4-3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ PIT | W 8-6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Miguel Rojas is a veteran in his 12th MLB season listed at 2B for the Dodgers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Miguel Rojas, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C+, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 114 |
| .262 |
| 7 |
| 27 |
| .715 |
| 5 |
| 76 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 103 | .283 | 6 | 36 | .747 | 8 | 87 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 125 | .236 | 5 | 31 | .612 | 8 | 91 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 140 | .236 | 6 | 36 | .606 | 9 | 111 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 132 | .265 | 9 | 48 | .714 | 13 | 131 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 40 | .304 | 4 | 20 | .888 | 5 | 38 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 132 | .284 | 5 | 46 | .710 | 9 | 137 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 153 | .252 | 11 | 53 | .643 | 6 | 123 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 90 | .290 | 1 | 26 | .736 | 2 | 79 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 123 | .247 | 1 | 14 | .613 | 2 | 48 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 60 | .282 | 1 | 17 | .695 | 0 | 40 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 85 | .181 | 1 | 9 | .463 | 0 | 27 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Wed, 6/10 | @ PIT | L 8-9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ PIT | W 12-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Sun, 6/7 | vs LAA | W 9-2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs LAA | W 1-0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ ARI | L 2-3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ ARI | W 7-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |