
#22 2B · Athletics
Height
6'0"
Weight
195 lbs
Age
34
College
Long Beach State
Draft
2013, Rd 12, #356
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Jeff McNeil
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jeff McNeil grades out as a middling 2B for Athletics (C Performance). That places him 47th of 72 graded second basemen. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 983 | 0.28073233 | 82 | 382 | 0.7694309 | 38 | 966 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 61 | .235 | 2 | 15 | .615 | 1 | 47 |
| 2025 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$50.0M
Guaranteed
$30.0M
AAV
$12.5M/yr
Jeff McNeil's WAR-tier baseline and counting stats together earn a C performance grade. At 34 and in his ninth season, McNeil is functioning as a solid-enough depth contributor rather than a franchise cornerstone, delivering the kind of middling offensive output you'd expect from an established veteran in a limited role. His 2026 season numbers—.247 AVG, 2 HR, 28 K across 58 games—reveal the real story beneath the positive sentiment swirling around Oakland: the bat has been quiet, and strikeouts are piling up relative to power production. The lack of home-run volume is the sharpest concern; two longballs in nearly 60 games falls well short of the offensive floor that justified his $12.5M salary or the goodwill attached to his arrival, even accounting for a mid-lineup role. McNeil's durability—appearing in 58 games—suggests opportunity has been there, but he hasn't capitalized on it at a level that matches the feel-good narrative around his first homer as an Athletic or the respect earned during his nine-year career. The sentiment bump he's received from the Mets tribute video and early wins is genuine, but it masks a performance reality: he's been a modest contributor in a lineup the Athletics are actively reinforcing with significant acquisitions, and sustaining that goodwill depends on his offensive production tightening considerably in the stretch run.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Jeff's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jeff McNeil ranks 47th of 72 graded second basemen by performance. That slots Jeff between Jose Fermin (C) just ahead and Edmundo Sosa (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Jose FerminCardinalsCNick YorkePiratesCMatt McLainRedsCGraded lower
Edmundo SosaPhilliesAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jeff McNeil is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at 2B for the Athletics. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jeff McNeil, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance C, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 122 |
| .243 |
| 12 |
| 54 |
| .746 |
| 3 |
| 97 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 129 | .238 | 12 | 44 | .692 | 5 | 101 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 156 | .270 | 10 | 55 | .711 | 10 | 158 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 148 | .326 | 9 | 62 | .836 | 4 | 174 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 120 | .251 | 7 | 35 | .679 | 3 | 97 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 52 | .311 | 4 | 23 | .837 | 0 | 57 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 133 | .318 | 23 | 75 | .915 | 5 | 162 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 63 | .329 | 3 | 19 | .852 | 7 | 74 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.