
#1 2B · Giants
Height
5'10"
Weight
186 lbs
Age
29
College
N/A
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Luis Arraez
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Luis Arraez grades out as a middling 2B for Giants (C- Performance). That places him 52nd of 72 graded second basemen. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 910 | 0.31704545 | 38 | 334 | 0.77745533 | 36 | 1116 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 69 | .319 | 2 | 26 | .787 | 5 | 88 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$12.0M
Guaranteed
$7.2M
AAV
$12.0M/yr
Luis Arraez's contract earns a D Contract Value Index, sitting where 2B deals at this $12M AAV typically resolve. The disconnect here is stark: a C- performance grade paired with a $12M annual commitment signals a player whose on-field production hasn't kept pace with his salary, a gap that widens when you consider the Giants are currently 20-27 and fighting to stay competitive in a difficult division. Arraez arrives at this deal as an established veteran with legitimate hardware — Silver Slugger awards in both 2022 and 2023 — which explains why the market was willing to pay for his pedigree, but those accolades are now doing heavy lifting to justify a one-year commitment that, based on current performance, looks overpriced at the margins. The Giants' recent roster activity — a flurry of depth signings across the pitching staff in mid-May — suggests organizational urgency to patch holes rather than confidence in the window, a context where a middle-infield veteran on a nine-figure deal becomes harder to defend. His sentiment grade of B+, buoyed by international presence and genuine likability, insulates him from the kind of criticism a struggling hitter at his salary would normally face on a losing team, but positive vibes don't change the ledger: this contract underperforms relative to its cost, and the Giants will need a significant second-half surge to make the economics work.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Luis's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Luis Arraez ranks 52nd of 72 graded second basemen by performance. That slots Luis between Ozzie Albies (C-) just ahead and Colt Keith (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Ozzie AlbiesBravesC-Tim TawaDiamondbacksC-Luisangel AcunaWhite SoxC-Graded lower
Colt KeithTigers| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/10 | vs WAS | W 11-10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/10 | vs WAS | L 3-6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Luis Arraez is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at 2B for the Giants. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Luis Arraez, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance C-, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 154 |
| .292 |
| 8 |
| 61 |
| .719 |
| 11 |
| 181 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 33 | .299 | 0 | 5 | .719 | 0 | 41 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 117 | .318 | 4 | 41 | .744 | 9 | 159 |
| 2024 | 150 | .314 | 4 | 46 | .738 | 9 | 200 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 147 | .354 | 10 | 69 | .862 | 3 | 203 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 144 | .316 | 8 | 49 | .795 | 4 | 173 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 121 | .294 | 2 | 42 | .733 | 2 | 126 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 32 | .321 | 0 | 13 | .766 | 0 | 36 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 92 | .334 | 4 | 28 | .838 | 2 | 109 |
Among 2B on the Giants, Luis Arraez's output grades to a C- performance level. The 2026 season shows a .325 batting average across 60 games, which reflects disciplined contact skills and the hallmark consistency that earned him Silver Slugger recognition in both 2022 and 2023, yet the broader offensive profile reveals significant erosion—just 2 home runs and 11 strikeouts tell a story of a player whose power and patience have both dimmed from his peak seasons. A middle-infield contributor who remains durable enough to log meaningful plate appearances, Arraez is functioning as a steady presence in a Giants lineup that has cratered to 28-41 and dead last in the NL West, but his anemic power output and lack of slugging punch leave him among the roster's quieter contributors on the stat sheet. The disconnect between his C- performance grade and his B+ sentiment score is instructive: his Silver Slugger pedigree, recent WBC involvement, and reputation as an engaged, likable veteran are insulating him from the criticism that typically befalls players on a team this dysfunctional, even as his on-field production slides toward replacement-level production for the position. As an established veteran entering the stretch run with regular season baseball set to conclude in 108 days, Arraez carries the organizational credibility to weather a down year, but the Giants' recent churn of roster additions and depth signings signals front-office concern about the team's competitive state—and should that concern intensify, even his goodwill equity may not shield him from trade deadline conversation.
Luis Arraez is one of the more interesting perception stories in the National League right now — a player whose public standing sits comfortably at B+ even as the Giants stumble to a 14-23 record and occupy the bottom of the NL West standings. The narrative driving that goodwill is genuine: recent coverage has leaned heavily on his WBC involvement, a comedic batting moment that went viral during the tournament opener, and his gracious public remarks about Oracle Park's atmosphere, all of which frame him as an engaging, internationally celebrated presence rather than a symbol of the team's early-season dysfunction. The disconnect between that warm sentiment and his C- performance grade is real and worth acknowledging — Arraez is drawing affection for personality and pedigree right now more than for on-field dominance, and his two Silver Slugger awards (2022 and 2023) are doing meaningful work keeping his reputation elevated while his 2026 production finds its footing. On the roster construction side, the Giants have been churning through a string of pitching additions and depth signings over the last few weeks, the kind of transactional churn that signals organizational concern about the roster's current state — but none of that noise has splashed back on Arraez, who remains insulated from criticism in a way most players on a 2-8-in-their-last-ten squad would not be. The bottom line is that Arraez's narrative is holding steady through a combination of genuine likability, international buzz, and the residual equity of a proven track record — a B+ sentiment score on a struggling team is a quiet testament to how much goodwill an established veteran can bank when there are no controversies to spend it down.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Tue, 6/9 | vs WAS | L 3-4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/8 | @ CHC | W 2-1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ CHC | L 2-3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ CHC | W 18-3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ MIL | W 12-9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | @ MIL | W 1-0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/2 | @ MIL | L 3-8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/1 | @ MIL | L 2-16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |