
American League · West Division
General Manager: David Forst
Oakland Coliseum
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
38
Players
49
Transactions
12
Contracts Graded
*(26-man active roster + 40-man expanded roster)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the Athletics the same way it covers every MLB franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the Athletics, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A, Performance C, Sentiment F. Front office leadership: David Forst.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 12 of 38 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The MLB team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the Athletics
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, Athletics is getting clear surplus value from its contracts (A Contract Value Index). That ranks 6th of 27 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a middle-of-the-pack roster (C Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The Athletics are getting outstanding value across the roster, earning a A CVI grade across 12 contracts evaluated. 2 contracts grade as positive value (B+ or better), while 10 fall below fair market value. Several contracts are grading below expectations, putting pressure on the payroll. With payroll well-allocated, the team has flexibility for deadline acquisitions or future free agent pursuits. Of 38 total rostered players, 12 have contracts eligible for CVI evaluation. This is one of the best-managed payrolls in MLB, positioning the franchise well for sustained competitiveness.
The Athletics are a middling playoff team treading water in the middle of the American League West—roster construction is holding them back from contention despite a modest win streak. With three ace-caliber arms anchoring the pitching staff, nine quality contributors distributed across lineup and bullpen, and a league-average core of 18 solid starters, Oakland has enough talent to stay competitive in a weak division, but the roster lacks the star power or depth cohesion required for a postseason run. The pitching depth appears to be the stronger unit here—three elite arms can carry a team through September if the bullpen stays healthy—but those same arms are likely propping up what is otherwise an inconsistent lineup lacking a franchise-level bat. The 36-36 record and #6 playoff seed reflect this imbalance: the team is treading water, winning just enough to stay afloat but not enough to inspire confidence heading into the final 103 days of the regular season. With nine depth-caliber players rounding out a 39-man roster, Oakland lacks the positional redundancy and bench production that separates contenders from pretenders. The front office's 27 transactions suggest active roster churn—a sign of either smart in-season adjustments or a lack of roster conviction—but the C-grade performance verdict makes clear that tinkering has not yielded a cohesive winning formula. Unless that ace trio elevates dramatically or the offense finds unexpected production, the Athletics' window remains a narrow one.
Oakland's front office has completely lost the fanbase. With the Athletics sitting at 36-36 and clinging to the sixth AL West seed with over three months of baseball remaining, an F-grade sentiment verdict reflects deep skepticism about the direction of the roster and organization — and the data tells you exactly why. Out of 27 total transactions graded this season, only seven drew positive reactions from fans and media, while 16 landed in mixed-to-skeptical territory; just four moves generated outright negativity, but the sheer volume of tepid reception signals a roster that hasn't excited anyone in a while. Joel Kuhnel's addition earned an A+ and stands as the organization's brightest spot, yet it's overshadowed by regrettable decisions like the Brooks Kriske deal (D-), which exemplifies the kind of low-impact roster construction that's dragged sentiment underwater. The pattern is unmistakable: more than half the moves have landed in the "we'll see" bucket, meaning the front office hasn't made a compelling case for the stretch run or the future. With the playoff picture still fluid but the roster's credibility in tatters, the Athletics need dramatic midseason moves or late-inning performances to shift this narrative — as it stands, fans are waiting to be convinced, not celebrating the plan.
Athletics ranks 6th of 27 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the Orioles (A+) just ahead and the Guardians (A) just behind.
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.