
#9C · New Orleans Pelicans
Height
6'11"
Weight
265 lbs
Age
37
College
Texas A&M
Experience
16 yrs
Wingspan
7'6.0"
Reach
9'5.5"
Grade DeAndre Jordan
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, DeAndre Jordan grades out as a middling C for New Orleans Pelicans (C+ Impact). That places him 47th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1121 | 4.1 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 69.6% | 15.4% | 47.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 10 | 4.1 | 6.4 | 0.8 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 10 | 4.1 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 69.6% | D D |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 7 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 100.0% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 50.0% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 66.7% | F F |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 3 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 100.0% | F F |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 57 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 1.6 | 76.3% | C+ C+ |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 56 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 1.9 | 66.6% | B B |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 69 | 11.0 | 13.1 | 2.3 | 64.1% | B+ B+ |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 77 | 12.0 | 15.2 | 1.5 | 64.5% | B+ B+ |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 7 | 15.4 | 14.4 | 0.7 | 70.5% | B B |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 6 | 11.7 | 16.3 | 1.8 | 63.2% | A A |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 14 | 13.1 | 13.4 | 1.1 | 71.6% | A A |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 13 | 9.6 | 12.5 | 0.8 | 73.0% | B B |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 6 | 3.7 | 6.3 | 0.2 | 45.5% | D- D- |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 11 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 0.4 | 52.5% | C- C- |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 80 | 7.1 | 7.2 | 0.5 | 68.6% | C C |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 70 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 60.5% | F F |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 53 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 63.3% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
On a roster with finite room, DeAndre Jordan's contract earns a C+ Contract Value Index against the NBA salary backdrop. At $2.27M AAV on a one-year deal, the structure itself is unimpeachable—a veteran minimum commitment that carries zero long-term cap risk—but the value equation hinges entirely on what a 37-year-old longtime veteran can deliver in a limited role. His 2025-26 production (4.1 PPG, 6.4 RPG across 10 games) reflects the reality of a backup center in decline, well removed from his All-NBA and All-Defensive prime of 2015-2017. The CVI grade sits at C+ rather than B or higher because the contract, while sensible in isolation, doesn't generate meaningful on-court return relative to even the modest salary he's drawing—his C- performance grade makes that plain. What elevates this deal's palatability, however, is the off-court narrative: his recent Teammate of the Year award and the warm media framing around his veteran presence as a stabilizing cultural force on a young Pelicans roster suggest the organization values his mentorship and professionalism beyond box-score contribution. For a one-year, low-dollar commitment on a 37-year-old journeyman, the CVI reflects a fair bargain that acknowledges both his diminished statistical output and his outsized locker-room worth.
DeAndre Jordan earns a C- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 1121 games, DeAndre is contributing 4.1 points, 6.4 rebounds, and 0.8 assists per game in his role. DeAndre's strongest area is FG% at 69.6, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.8 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, DeAndre ranks 47th.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where DeAndre's contract sits relative to comparable money.
DeAndre Jordan ranks 47th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots DeAndre between Isaiah Jackson (C-) just ahead and Clint Capela (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Isaiah JacksonLos Angeles ClippersC-Skal LabissiereWashington WizardsC-Dylan CardwellSacramento KingsC-Graded lower
Clint CapelaHouston RocketsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
DeAndre Jordan is a veteran in his 16th NBA season listed at C for the New Orleans Pelicans. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on DeAndre Jordan, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C-, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.3 |
| 0.8 |
| 69.6% |
| 0.0% |
| 60.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 7 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 3 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 57 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 76.3% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 56 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 66.6% | 0.0% | 68.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 69 | 11.0 | 13.1 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 64.1% | 0.0% | 70.5% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 77 | 12.0 | 15.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 64.5% | 0.0% | 58.0% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 7 | 15.4 | 14.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 70.5% | 0.0% | 39.3% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 6 | 11.7 | 16.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 63.2% | 0.0% | 37.3% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 14 | 13.1 | 13.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 71.6% | 0.0% | 42.7% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 13 | 9.6 | 12.5 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 73.0% | 0.0% | 43.4% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 6 | 3.7 | 6.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 45.5% | 0.0% | 22.2% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 11 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 52.5% | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 80 | 7.1 | 7.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 68.6% | 0.0% | 45.2% |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 70 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 60.5% | 0.0% | 37.5% |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 53 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 63.3% | 0.0% | 38.5% |
Beat coverage and fan boards are running roughly even on DeAndre Jordan, landing him at a B+ sentiment grade. The narrative around the 37-year-old center has crystallized around a genuinely uncommon storyline: his Teammate of the Year award has transformed him from a fading veteran into a cultural asset, generating warm media coverage that emphasizes his locker-room leadership and professionalism over statistical contribution. This perception sits in stark contrast to his C- performance grade—his 2025-26 season numbers of 4.1 PPG and 6.4 RPG across 10 games reflect a player far removed from his All-NBA prime (which earned him first-team honors in 2016 and third-team nods in 2015 and 2017)—but the gap between production and reputation rarely works this much in a player's favor. Recent headlines citing Blake Griffin's endorsement and the Teammate of the Year honor have framed Jordan as precisely the kind of stabilizing presence a young Pelicans roster needs, a narrative that has insulated him from the criticism that typically befalls backup centers on modest contracts. The net effect is clear: Jordan has earned considerable goodwill as a mentor and locker-room cornerstone, allowing media and fans to view his limited on-court role not as organizational failure but as an intentional roster construction choice that serves a purpose beyond the box score.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.