
#32C · Sacramento Kings
Height
6'10"
Weight
255 lbs
Age
24
College
Auburn
Experience
0 yrs
Grade Dylan Cardwell
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Dylan Cardwell grades out as a middling C for Sacramento Kings (C+ Impact). That places him 45th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a prospect, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 44 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 58.7% | 50.0% | 51.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 44 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 1.4 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 44 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 58.7% | C C |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ POR | L 110-122 | 21 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-1 | -12 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs GSW | W 124-118 | 24 | 7 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$3.0M
Guaranteed
$3.0M
AAV
$755K/yr
Earning a B- Contract Value Index, Dylan Cardwell's 4-year pact reflects Sacramento's read on rotation impact. At $755K AAV, this is a minimum-salary rookie deal structured to preserve flexibility while the organization evaluates a developmental big man whose skill profile has generated genuine analytical interest despite his early-career stage. Through 44 games in the 2025-26 season, Cardwell posted 5.4 PPG and 7.5 RPG, production that aligns with his C- performance grade and confirms he's a role player whose value manifests in specific contexts—rebounding efficiency and shot-blocking—rather than volume scoring. For a 24-year-old in his rookie season on a non-guaranteed contract, the value proposition is straightforward: Sacramento has committed minimal salary to a player the front office publicly compared to Hall of Fame-caliber talent, betting that his elite efficiency and defensive instincts will compound as he matures. The CVI grade reflects this smart stewardship—a cheap contract on a player with genuine developmental appeal and no downside risk, even if the Kings' 22-60 record and recent rotation-shuffling via late-season signings suggest the organization is in evaluation mode rather than building around any single contributor. The four-year term provides runway without commitment, making this the kind of low-risk, high-upside construction that defines shrewd roster management in a rebuilding context.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Dylan's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Dylan Cardwell ranks 45th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Dylan between Derik Queen (C) just ahead and DeAndre Jordan (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Derik QueenNew Orleans PelicansCHunter DickinsonNew Orleans PelicansC-Isaiah JacksonLos Angeles ClippersC-Graded lower
DeAndre JordanNew Orleans PelicansNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Dylan Cardwell is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at C for the Sacramento Kings. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Dylan Cardwell, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance C-, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.7 |
| 1.5 |
| 58.7% |
| 50.0% |
| 51.0% |
| 7 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 3-6 |
| 1-1 |
| +3 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ GSW | L 105-110 | 26 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | +1 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs NOP | W 117-113 | 24 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | +4 |
Dylan Cardwell earns a C- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 44 games, Dylan is contributing 5.4 points, 7.5 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Dylan's strongest area is RPG at 7.5, which compares favorably to the center median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.4 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Dylan ranks 45th. At 24, Dylan is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Sacramento Kings.
Dylan Cardwell enters the 2025-26 season as an intriguing depth piece for Sacramento after an encouraging rookie campaign that saw him earn a guaranteed contract despite going undrafted. Media coverage has been decidedly positive, framing his journey as a feel-good story of perseverance and NBA readiness—headlines emphasize his "stellar" rookie season and successful transition from Auburn to the league. However, his modest statistical profile (5.4 PPG, 7.5 RPG, 1.5 BPG) and sub-$1M annual salary place him firmly in the backup big-man category, limiting mainstream attention and national perception. Fan sentiment appears cautiously optimistic, viewing him as a potential long-term rotation contributor rather than an immediate impact player, with expectations calibrated to his role as a reserve center. Heading into year two, Cardwell's perception hinges on whether he can sustain or build upon his rookie efficiency and defensive activity—a quiet, steady trajectory would solidify his standing as a reliable organizational asset.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.