
Western Conference · Southwest Division
GM: David Griffin
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
18
Players
6
Transactions
18
Contracts Graded
*(15 active roster + 2 two-way contracts)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the New Orleans Pelicans the same way it covers every NBA franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the New Orleans Pelicans, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance F, Sentiment F. Front office leadership: David Griffin.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 18 of 18 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The NBA team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the New Orleans Pelicans
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, New Orleans Pelicans is spending roughly in line with the market (C- Contract Value Index). That ranks 20th of 30 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a roster among the league’s thinnest (F Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The New Orleans Pelicans' roster construction reflects a franchise caught between competing ambitions, earning a C- Contract Value Index (CVI) — a grade that signals meaningful inefficiency without catastrophic mismanagement. Of their 18 active contracts, only six represent genuine value plays, while eight deals qualify as outright overpays, leaving the middle ground sparse and the overall portfolio tilted toward expenditure. This imbalance reveals a front office that has either overcommitted to aging or declining talent, paid market-rate dollars for fringe starters, or struggled to find efficiency in mid-tier salary slots where most salary flexibility typically hides. With the team sitting at 26-56 and firmly outside playoff contention, the urgency to justify those overpaid deals through veteran performance is gone, making the CVI assessment particularly brutal — the Pelicans are absorbing above-market rates for players who aren't moving the needle in a lost season. Cap flexibility is severely constrained; the weight of eight overpays, even paired with six solid deals, leaves little room to add meaningful rotation help or pivot toward a retool. Moving forward, the front office must ruthlessly prioritize next offseason's roster surgery, shedding contracts and resetting around younger talent if the franchise hopes to escape this cycle of expensive mediocrity and rebuild with efficiency.
The New Orleans Pelicans are squarely a **lottery-bound roster** with structural roster-building problems that extend far beyond this season's 26-56 collapse. Of their 18 graded players, zero reach All-Star caliber, and the team relies on just two quality starters to anchor both ends of the floor—a dangerously top-heavy construction that leaves no margin for injury or inconsistency. The remaining 16 players break down into six rotation-caliber contributors and ten depth pieces, a distribution that screams developmental roster or mid-market team in transition rather than a competitive unit. With 6 days until the Finals and the Pelicans sitting 11th in the West at 1-9 over their last ten games, there is no championship window to defend here—this is a team stuck between lottery purgatory and long-term rebuild, having added just four transactions this season without demonstrating the offensive or defensive cohesion needed to elevate complementary talent into winning basketball. The absence of an All-Star caliber centerpiece, combined with a bottom-heavy depth chart where the majority of minutes flow to below-average-to-replacement-level contributors, means even incremental roster improvement will take years, not months. Until the front office either hits on a blue-chip prospect or acquires a franchise-altering talent via trade or free agency, the Pelicans are locked into a downward trajectory with few internal levers to pull upward in the short term.
The New Orleans Pelicans are facing a full confidence crisis heading into the Finals week, with an F-grade sentiment that reflects widespread skepticism across the fanbase and media over the team's roster moves. Of four transactions executed this offseason, three landed poorly: two generated outright negative reactions, while only one drew positive support, leaving a 1-3 approval ratio that tells the story of a front office out of step with what the market—and the fan base—expected. The Bryce McGowens acquisition earned the team's only B-grade reception, positioning it as the lone bright spot in an otherwise bungled transaction sequence. By contrast, the Dalen Terry move bottomed out at an F grade and emerged as the franchise's most criticized decision, crystallizing fan frustration into a single, emblematic target. The pattern is unambiguous and trending sharply negative: mixed reactions on one deal couldn't offset the damage of two outright disasters, and with a 26-56 record and playoff positioning precarious, the Pelicans' offseason blueprint has already lost the room. Barring a dramatic mid-season course correction or unexpected trade-market activity, expect sentiment to deteriorate further as the season unfolds—this front office will need wins to rebuild credibility, and the current trajectory suggests they won't find them easily.
New Orleans Pelicans ranks 20th of 30 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the Chicago Bulls (C) just ahead and the Brooklyn Nets (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Chicago BullsCUtah JazzCAtlanta HawksCGraded lower
Brooklyn NetsD+Golden State WarriorsD+Memphis GrizzliesD+Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.