
#58 RP · Phillies
Height
6'1"
Weight
205 lbs
Age
34
College
N/A
Experience
4 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/L
Grade Tanner Banks
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Tanner Banks grades out as a strong RP for Phillies (B Performance). That places him 150th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 218 | 3.866585 | 11-12 | 261 | 1.233782 | 0.0 | 4 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 21 | 6.75 | 0-3 | 25 | 2.06 | 21.1 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.2M
Guaranteed
$720K
AAV
$1.2M/yr
Tanner Banks delivers the kind of production that earns a B performance grade against MLB RP comps. At 34 years old and five seasons into his career, Banks has positioned himself as a solid middle-relief option — the kind of dependable veteran whose stuff still plays in high-leverage situations without carrying the upside of a dominant closer or dominant setup man. His 2026 season includes 25 strikeouts across 21 games, demonstrating consistent availability and the ability to generate whiffs in his relief appearances, a hallmark of functional bullpen depth. The primary limitation is the absence of a win-loss record alongside that strikeout total, which suggests his scorekeeping impact has been muted — likely a function of working in lower-leverage moments or inheriting difficult situations where run support dried up before he took the mound. The Phillies' recent bullpen additions — Jackson Rutledge, Kyle Backhus, Zach Pop, and Aaron Nola among others — reflect a front office intent to layer talent above him in the hierarchy, which aligns with the media framing that casts Banks as a legitimate but understated setup piece rather than a centerpiece. His role remains that of a reliable secondary reliever in a structured bullpen architecture, and his B-grade performance validates what the organization already knows: he's above replacement level but unlikely to be the story in a pennant race.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Tanner's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Tanner Banks ranks 150th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Tanner between Franco Aleman (B) just ahead and Steven Matz (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Franco AlemanGuardiansBTommy KahnleRed SoxBJack AndersonRed SoxBGraded lower
Steven MatzRays| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | vs MIA | W 8-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sun, 6/14 | @ MIL | L 0-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Tanner Banks is a player in his 4th MLB season listed at RP for the Phillies. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Tanner Banks, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 69 |
| 3.07 |
| 6-2 |
| 61 |
| 1.01 |
| 67.1 |
| 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 41 | 4.13 | 2-2 | 55 | 1.29 | 48.0 | 2 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 22 | 3.70 | 0-1 | 23 | 1.32 | 24.1 | 0 |
| 2024 | 63 | 3.98 | 2-3 | 78 | 1.30 | 72.1 | 2 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 32 | 4.43 | 1-4 | 51 | 1.23 | 61.0 | 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 35 | 3.06 | 2-0 | 49 | 1.13 | 53.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sat, 6/6 | vs CHW | L 3-6 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |