
#71 RP · Cubs
Height
6'2"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
32
College
N/A
Experience
6 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Jacob Webb
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jacob Webb grades out as a strong RP for Cubs (B+ Performance). That places him 116th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B+, good value. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 274 | 2.9180522 | 18-15 | 277 | 1.2114015 | 0.0 | 8 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 28 | 2.22 | 1-1 | 34 | 1.27 | 28.1 | 1 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.5M
Guaranteed
$900K
AAV
$1.5M/yr
Per-game impact for Jacob Webb pencils out to a B+ performance grade. At 32 years old with seven seasons under his belt, Webb is operating as a reliable mid-tier depth reliever—the kind of veteran arm teams deploy in moderate-leverage situations rather than high-leverage closures, which aligns perfectly with his $1.5M one-year contract structure. His 2026 season production of 34 strikeouts across 28 games demonstrates consistent availability and a willingness to eat innings, the exact trait that's earned favorable beat-writer coverage around his multi-inning versatility. The first loss he absorbed last Sunday is a minor blemish on an otherwise solid profile, but one setback doesn't erase the underlying utility he's providing to a bullpen in active construction mode. What makes Webb interesting is the gap between his B+ performance and his B- sentiment grade—he's quietly outproducing the cautious optimism surrounding him, which means there's genuine room for his narrative to upgrade if he continues to deliver in lower-leverage spots as the Cubs navigate their competitive depth situation heading into the final stretch. At this stage of his career and with the Cubs actively cycling through bullpen depth, Webb's value hinges entirely on staying healthy and available; he's not a closer-in-waiting or a breakout star, but he's the kind of competent veteran who can stabilize a back-end rotation when called upon.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Jacob's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jacob Webb ranks 116th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Jacob between Jeff Criswell (B+) just ahead and Clayton Beeter (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Jeff CriswellRockiesB+Kevin GinkelDiamondbacksB+Cameron WestonOriolesB+Graded lower
Clayton BeeterNationals| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | vs COL | W 5-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ COL | L 2-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jacob Webb is a player in his 6th MLB season listed at RP for the Cubs. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jacob Webb, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance B+, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 55 |
| 3.00 |
| 5-4 |
| 58 |
| 1.03 |
| 66.0 |
| 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 60 | 3.02 | 2-5 | 58 | 1.18 | 56.2 | 2 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 29 | 3.98 | 1-1 | 34 | 1.36 | 31.2 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 25 | 3.27 | 0-0 | 23 | 1.18 | 22.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 54 | 3.69 | 1-1 | 57 | 1.29 | 53.2 | 1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 34 | 4.19 | 5-4 | 33 | 1.51 | 34.1 | 1 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 8 | 0.00 | 0-0 | 10 | 1.20 | 10.0 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 36 | 1.39 | 4-0 | 28 | 1.11 | 32.1 | 2 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Mon, 6/8 | vs SF | L 1-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs SF | W 3-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sat, 5/30 | @ STL | W 6-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |