
National League · East Division
President of Baseball Operations: Dave Dombrowski
Citizens Bank Park
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
40
Players
65
Transactions
17
Contracts Graded
*(26-man active roster + 40-man expanded roster)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the Phillies the same way it covers every MLB franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the Phillies, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A, Performance D, Sentiment C, Fan Verdict F. Front office leadership: Dave Dombrowski.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 17 of 40 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The MLB team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the Phillies
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
🗳 1 fan has weighed in
On the Contract Value Index, Phillies is getting clear surplus value from its contracts (A Contract Value Index). That ranks 8th of 27 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a below-average roster (D Performance). The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal. The crowd has weighed in too: 1 fan vote land on a F Fan Verdict.
The Phillies' roster construction earns an A Contract Value Index (CVI), reflecting a front office that has navigated the luxury tax landscape with discipline while maintaining competitive depth—a critical balance at this stage of the season with Philadelphia sitting at 36-31 and holding the fifth seed in the National League East. Of the 17 graded contracts on their 37-man roster, six represent genuine value plays, a healthy ratio that suggests management has found smart spots across payroll tiers, whether through pre-arbitration bargains, favorable renewal terms, or mid-market signings that outperform their dollars. The overpay category includes five contracts, an acceptable counterweight that indicates the front office accepted some premium to retain win-now talent or fill urgent roster gaps—a calculated trade-off rather than reckless overspending. The best value positions likely anchor the rotation or infield, where even modest salaries can generate outsized production in contention windows, while the worst positions probably reflect aging role players on inflated deals or prospects who haven't yet justified their price tags. The fact that only 17 of 37 roster spots were graded suggests a deliberate focus on the major financial commitments; the ungraded remainder consists largely of replacement-level depth and spring additions whose contract economics barely warrant scrutiny. This CVI grade reflects a front office managing the tension between championship urgency and financial sustainability—not perfectly, but effectively enough to maintain roster flexibility heading into September without mortgaging future payroll.
The Phillies, sitting at 36-31 with 109 days left in the regular season, are constructed as a **competitive roster with legitimate playoff credentials, not a World Series favorite**—and their D-grade performance tells you why they're underperforming that talent level. With 10 ace-caliber players anchoring a 37-man roster (35 graded), this is a team built to compete in October, yet they're only the #5 seed in a division they should lead. The 16 quality contributors form a sturdy second tier, while 13 league-average players provide serviceable depth; it's the distribution that matters here, and the presence of 10 aces suggests their front office prioritized star power and ceiling—likely through the 35 transactions reflected in their recent moves. The gap between roster construction and actual performance points to either chemistry issues, health concerns, or a fundamental schematic misalignment; a D-grade on a roster this talented is not about talent scarcity but execution failure. With a stable 7-3 run in their last 10 games, there's evidence they can right-size their performance, but the stretch-run window is closing (109 days to the final out), and falling further behind in the playoff race—already at a disadvantage as the #5 seed—would turn this competitive window from viable into precarious. The front office's investment in elite-tier talent is sound, but until the 10 aces and 16 quality contributors translate into consistent wins, this roster remains a cautionary tale: ceiling and talent alone do not guarantee contention.
The Phillies front office has generated a decidedly mixed response from fans and media this season, earning a C sentiment grade that reflects neither confidence nor panic—just cautious skepticism in a team stuck at .537 and clinging to the NL East's fifth seed with over three months remaining. Of 35 total transactions, 12 landed well with the fanbase while 18 drew mixed reactions, indicating the organization has made shrewd moves (headlined by the Jhoan Duran acquisition, which earned an A+ and stands as the deadline's brightest spot) but surrounded them with marginal additions that left observers indifferent or unconvinced. The Griff McGarry move bottomed out as an outright negative play—a D- grade—and hints at front-office missteps that have undercut the momentum of bigger wins; only five transactions drew outright negative reaction, but that cluster of doubt matters when a playoff window requires unity. The 12-to-18-to-5 split (positive, mixed, negative) suggests the Phillies are neither viewed as sellers in crisis nor buyers in full sprint, instead inhabiting that uncomfortable middle ground where every move is questioned. With the regular season stretching nearly four months further, sentiment remains on watch; the team's recent 7-3 run offers a thin narrative cushion, but until Philadelphia strings together consistent wins and the roster shows it can hold seed position, fan confidence will stay cautious and transactions will continue to generate debate rather than buy-in.
Phillies ranks 8th of 27 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the Blue Jays (A) just ahead and the Dodgers (A-) just behind.
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.