
#31 SP · Blue Jays
Height
6'3"
Weight
208 lbs
Age
41
College
Missouri
Draft
2006, Rd 1, #11
Experience
18 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Max Scherzer
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Max Scherzer grades out as a strong SP for Blue Jays (B- Performance). That places him 110th of 252 graded starting pitchers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 18+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 489 | 3.2683418 | 222-121 | 3503 | 1.0887772 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 6 | 10.23 | 1-4 | 14 | 1.73 | 22.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.0M
Guaranteed
$1.8M
AAV
$3.0M/yr
Max Scherzer's WAR-tier baseline and counting stats together earn a B- performance grade. The 2026 season shows him in a heavily managed state—1 win and 10 strikeouts across 5 appearances reflects the reality of a 41-year-old working through multiple injury rehab windows rather than a pitcher anchoring a rotation. His strength lies in what those limited innings have demonstrated: three scoreless frames in his first rehab start signals that when healthy, the mechanics and competitive instinct remain credible for a franchise-caliber ace, even at this career stage. The obvious weakness is durability—right forearm tendinitis and left ankle inflammation have already derailed continuity, and the Blue Jays' concurrent additions of six pitchers (Bieber, Woods Richardson, Andrews, Nance, Macko, and Garcia) over a five-day span in early June make it clear Toronto is treating Scherzer as a high-risk complement to depth rather than a reliable workhorse. His pedigree—three Cy Young Awards and All-MLB selections across 2019, 2021, and 2022—commands respect, and media framing portrays him as a focused veteran refusing to accept decline, yet the fragile health picture and the team's simultaneous roster reinforcement underscore that even decorated aces have margins that narrow with age and injury history. With Toronto sitting at 33-36 and facing a genuine playoff climb, Scherzer's availability matters more than his peak ceiling; if he can stay on the field, he remains a credible midrotation piece with upside; if the injury pattern persists, he'll be a situational contributor in a crowded staff.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Max's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Max Scherzer ranks 110th of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Max between Luis Severino (B-) just ahead and Adrian Houser (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Luis SeverinoAthleticsB-Casey MizeTigersB-Tyler WellsOriolesB-Graded lower
Adrian HouserGiantsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Max Scherzer is a veteran in his 18th MLB season listed at SP for the Blue Jays. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Max Scherzer, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance B-, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 17 |
| 5.19 |
| 5-5 |
| 82 |
| 1.29 |
| 85.0 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 9 | 3.95 | 2-4 | 40 | 1.15 | 43.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 19 | 4.01 | 9-4 | 121 | 1.19 | 107.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 8 | 3.20 | 4-2 | 53 | 0.96 | 45.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 27 | 3.77 | 13-6 | 174 | 1.12 | 152.2 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 23 | 2.29 | 11-5 | 173 | 0.91 | 145.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 19 | 2.76 | 8-4 | 147 | 0.89 | 111.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 11 | 1.98 | 7-0 | 89 | 0.82 | 68.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 30 | 2.46 | 15-4 | 236 | 0.86 | 179.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 12 | 3.74 | 5-4 | 92 | 1.38 | 67.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 27 | 2.92 | 11-7 | 243 | 1.03 | 172.1 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 33 | 2.53 | 18-7 | 300 | 0.91 | 220.2 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 31 | 2.51 | 16-6 | 268 | 0.90 | 200.2 | 0 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 34 | 2.96 | 20-7 | 284 | 0.97 | 228.1 | 0 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 33 | 2.79 | 14-12 | 276 | 0.92 | 228.2 | 0 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 33 | 3.15 | 18-5 | 252 | 1.18 | 220.1 | 0 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 32 | 2.90 | 21-3 | 240 | 0.97 | 214.1 | 0 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 32 | 3.74 | 16-7 | 231 | 1.27 | 187.2 | 0 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 33 | 4.43 | 15-9 | 174 | 1.35 | 195.0 | 0 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 31 | 3.50 | 12-11 | 184 | 1.25 | 195.2 | 0 |
| 2009 | ![]() | 30 | 4.12 | 9-11 | 174 | 1.34 | 170.1 | 0 |
| 2008 | ![]() | 16 | 3.05 | 0-4 | 66 | 1.23 | 56.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.