
#17 SP · Rangers
Height
6'2"
Weight
217 lbs
Age
36
College
N/A
Draft
2008, Rd 11, #337
Experience
14 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Nathan Eovaldi
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Nathan Eovaldi grades out as an excellent SP for Rangers (A- Performance). That places him 33rd of 252 graded starting pitchers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 14+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 325 | 3.8827548 | 107-88 | 1542 | 1.2464428 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 12 | 4.10 | 5-6 | 74 | 1.18 | 74.2 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$75.0M
Guaranteed
$45.0M
AAV
$25.0M/yr
Tape review and advanced metrics converge on an A- performance grade for Nathan Eovaldi. At 36 years old and 14 seasons into his career, Eovaldi is pitching at a well-above-average level for a veteran starter—the kind of anchor performance that justifies his $25M salary and the Rangers' decision to hand him the Opening Day start against Philadelphia. His mechanics and pitch sequencing have drawn focused media praise rather than criticism, and his 2023 All-MLB Second Team selection demonstrates his pedigree as one of baseball's better arms not long ago. The disconnect between his on-field execution and his C-sentiment grade reflects team context more than individual failure: Texas sits at 24-25 with considerable roster turbulence in recent weeks, which mutes the narrative momentum a solid veteran ace would normally generate in a winning environment. Eovaldi is doing his job—delivering quality starts even when offensive support falters—but he remains caught in a holding pattern where respect and production haven't yet translated into the kind of winning-adjacent buzz that typically elevates a late-career pitcher's public standing. For a team fighting for footing in the AL West with four months of baseball ahead, his steady, veteran reliability is precisely what the roster construction needs, even if the headlines haven't caught up to the grade.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Nathan's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Nathan Eovaldi ranks 33rd of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Nathan between Drew Rasmussen (A) just ahead and Framber Valdez (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Drew RasmussenRaysAGrant HolmesBravesATrey YesavageBlue JaysAGraded lower
Framber ValdezTigers| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 6/14 | @ BOS | W 6-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Tue, 6/2 | @ STL | W 7-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Nathan Eovaldi is a veteran in his 14th MLB season listed at SP for the Rangers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Nathan Eovaldi, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance A-, Sentiment A.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 22 |
| 1.73 |
| 11-3 |
| 129 |
| 0.85 |
| 130.0 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 29 | 3.80 | 12-8 | 166 | 1.11 | 170.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 25 | 3.63 | 12-5 | 132 | 1.14 | 144.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 20 | 3.87 | 6-3 | 103 | 1.23 | 109.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 32 | 3.75 | 11-9 | 195 | 1.19 | 182.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 9 | 3.72 | 4-2 | 52 | 1.20 | 48.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 23 | 5.99 | 2-1 | 70 | 1.58 | 67.2 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 10 | 4.26 | 3-4 | 53 | 0.98 | 57.0 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 12 | 3.33 | 3-3 | 48 | 1.28 | 54.0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 22 | 3.81 | 6-7 | 101 | 1.13 | 111.0 | 0 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 24 | 4.76 | 9-8 | 97 | 1.31 | 124.2 | 0 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 27 | 4.20 | 14-3 | 121 | 1.45 | 154.1 | 0 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 33 | 4.37 | 6-14 | 142 | 1.33 | 199.2 | 0 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 18 | 3.39 | 4-6 | 78 | 1.32 | 106.1 | 0 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 10 | 4.15 | 1-6 | 34 | 1.47 | 56.1 | 0 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 12 | 4.43 | 3-7 | 44 | 1.54 | 63.0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 22 | 4.30 | 4-13 | 78 | 1.51 | 119.1 | 0 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 10 | 3.63 | 1-2 | 23 | 1.38 | 34.2 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.