
#21 SP · Rockies
Height
6'4"
Weight
204 lbs
Age
33
College
Evansville
Draft
2014, Rd 1, #8
Experience
9 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Kyle Freeland
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kyle Freeland grades out as a middling SP for Rockies (C- Performance). That places him 205th of 252 graded starting pitchers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 247 | 4.673604 | 66-96 | 989 | 1.4284264 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 11 | 7.81 | 1-6 | 45 | 1.70 | 53.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
5 years
Total Value
$64.5M
Guaranteed
$38.7M
AAV
$12.9M/yr
Kyle Freeland's performance grade lands at C-, capturing how he stacks up at SP this season. At 33, the established veteran left-hander remains a reliable mid-rotation arm for Colorado, performing competently without distinction—the kind of starter who eats innings without dominating or collapsing. The recent headlines around his opening day start and pitch sequencing analysis underscore what the media framingmakes clear: Freeland is valued for mechanical consistency and adaptation to Coors Field's unique environment rather than for strikeout upside or dominance. His steady presence in the rotation reflects the Rockies' modest expectations for a pitcher in his career stage, where predictability and durability matter more than breakthrough performances. With the team sitting at 19-32 and clearly in rebuild mode based on their recent roster moves, Freeland operates as a veteran anchor in an otherwise unsettled rotation—a competent floor rather than a ceiling raiser. The lack of awards recognition and the neutral media sentiment around his name confirm his role: a solid starter who won't generate excitement but won't become a liability either, embodying the mid-tier professionalism that defines a long MLB career without Hall-of-Fame trajectory.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Kyle's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kyle Freeland ranks 205th of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Kyle between Michael Lorenzen (C-) just ahead and Blas Castano (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Michael LorenzenRockiesC-Yoendrys GomezTwinsC-Taj BradleyTwinsC-Graded lower
Blas CastanoRockies| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/2 | @ LAA | W 9-8 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kyle Freeland is a veteran in his 9th MLB season listed at SP for the Rockies. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kyle Freeland, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance C-, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 31 |
| 4.98 |
| 5-17 |
| 124 |
| 1.42 |
| 162.2 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 21 | 5.24 | 5-8 | 85 | 1.41 | 113.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 29 | 5.03 | 6-14 | 94 | 1.47 | 155.2 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 31 | 4.53 | 9-11 | 131 | 1.41 | 174.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 23 | 4.33 | 7-8 | 105 | 1.42 | 120.2 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 13 | 4.33 | 2-3 | 46 | 1.42 | 70.2 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 22 | 6.73 | 3-11 | 79 | 1.58 | 104.1 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 33 | 2.85 | 17-7 | 173 | 1.25 | 202.1 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 33 | 4.10 | 11-11 | 107 | 1.49 | 156.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.