
#24 SP · Rockies
Height
6'1"
Weight
217 lbs
Age
34
College
Cal State Fullerton
Draft
2013, Rd 1, #38
Experience
11 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Michael Lorenzen
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Michael Lorenzen grades out as a middling SP for Rockies (C- Performance). That places him 197th of 252 graded starting pitchers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 443 | 4.221442 | 56-61 | 862 | 1.3410977 | 0.0 | 15 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 14 | 8.01 | 2-8 | 48 | 1.99 | 60.2 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$8.0M
Guaranteed
$4.8M
AAV
$8.0M/yr
Per-game impact for Michael Lorenzen pencils out to a C- performance grade. At 34 years old with 12 seasons of professional experience behind him, Lorenzen operates as a back-of-the-rotation innings-eater on a rebuilding club—functional but not a difference-maker in a landscape where Colorado has been cycling through relief arms and depth starters with relentless urgency. His 2026 season production reflects that tier: 2 wins and 48 strikeouts across 14 games represents the kind of modest volume you'd expect from a veteran arm managing workload in a lost season rather than anchoring a contending rotation. The strikeout rate hints at some residual stuff, but the win total underscores the structural challenge of pitching at Coors Field, where the media narrative around him has fixated on unfavorable BABIP luck as much as his actual results—a dynamic that obscures any meaningful baseline of reliability. His stated role remains precisely what his contract ($8M on a one-year deal) and Colorado's reactive pitching acquisitions suggest: a serviceable veteran presence whose durability matters more than his ceiling. With the Rockies currently 26-43 and the regular season approaching its final stretch, Lorenzen's performance trajectory is largely defined by how well he absorbs innings in an environment that has historically punished pitchers, rather than by any expectation he'll elevate a struggling staff into contention.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Michael's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Michael Lorenzen ranks 197th of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Michael between Bryce Elder (C-) just ahead and Taj Bradley (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Bryce ElderBravesC-Mike BurrowsAstrosC-Dustin MayCardinalsC-Graded lower
Taj BradleyTwins| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | @ CHC | L 4-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 6/11 | vs CHC | W 3-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Michael Lorenzen is a veteran in his 11th MLB season listed at SP for the Rockies. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Michael Lorenzen, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance C-, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 27 |
| 4.64 |
| 7-11 |
| 127 |
| 1.33 |
| 141.2 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 19 | 3.81 | 5-6 | 75 | 1.28 | 101.2 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 7 | 1.57 | 2-0 | 22 | 1.08 | 28.2 | 0 |
| 2024 | 26 | 3.31 | 7-6 | 97 | 1.24 | 130.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 18 | 3.58 | 5-7 | 83 | 1.10 | 105.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 11 | 5.51 | 4-2 | 28 | 1.46 | 47.1 | 1 |
| 2023 | 29 | 4.18 | 9-9 | 111 | 1.21 | 153.0 | 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 18 | 4.24 | 8-6 | 85 | 1.28 | 97.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 27 | 5.59 | 1-2 | 21 | 1.38 | 29.0 | 4 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 18 | 4.28 | 3-1 | 35 | 1.40 | 33.2 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 73 | 2.92 | 1-4 | 85 | 1.15 | 83.1 | 7 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 45 | 3.11 | 4-2 | 54 | 1.38 | 81.0 | 1 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 70 | 4.45 | 8-4 | 80 | 1.35 | 83.0 | 2 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 35 | 2.88 | 2-1 | 48 | 1.08 | 50.0 | 0 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 27 | 5.40 | 4-9 | 83 | 1.66 | 113.1 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/4 | @ LAA | L 4-11 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |