
#45 SP · Athletics
Height
6'1"
Weight
245 lbs
Age
31
College
N/A
Draft
2016, Rd 3, #92
Experience
7 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Aaron Civale
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Aaron Civale grades out as a middling SP for Athletics (C Performance). That places him 179th of 252 graded starting pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C-, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 151 | 4.1486144 | 48-46 | 704 | 1.2279598 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 11 | 4.20 | 5-2 | 39 | 1.47 | 55.2 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$6.0M
Guaranteed
$3.6M
AAV
$6.0M/yr
How Aaron Civale plays at SP earns him a C performance grade. The 2026 season: 5W, 39 K, 11 games stat line reflects a mid-rotation starter who is performing below the level expected of an established veteran arm — his strikeout total of 39 across 11 appearances suggests modest run prevention, and the five wins indicate he has not been a consistent decision-getter despite meaningful innings pitched. His strikeout rate represents his clearest strength on the mound, showing he retains the ability to miss bats when location works, but the broader performance picture does not yet justify the organizational confidence Mark Kotsay expressed at his debut. The durability concern sits front and center: 11 games into the Athletics' season, Civale has already logged meaningful work, but the cumulative production — five wins and moderate strikeout volume — has not translated into the stabilizing force Oakland needs from a $6M AAV mid-rotation anchor. At 30 years old with eight seasons of professional experience, Civale came to Oakland positioned as a dependable piece in a rotation that the front office is actively building out with recent acquisitions, yet early results suggest he is currently underperforming relative to that veteran role. The sentiment-performance gap is notable: his B- sentiment grade reflects cautious optimism baked into the narrative of a reasonable acquisition, but his C performance grade indicates that on-field results are lagging behind the goodwill he entered with — if that production does not climb over the remaining stretch-run weeks, that measured confidence will evaporate quickly.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Aaron's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Aaron Civale ranks 179th of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Aaron between Logan Allen (C) just ahead and Mitch Keller (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Logan AllenGuardiansCMick AbelTwinsCKen WaldichukNationalsCGraded lower
Mitch KellerPiratesAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Aaron Civale is a player in his 7th MLB season listed at SP for the Athletics. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Aaron Civale, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance C, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 5 |
| 4.91 |
| 1-2 |
| 19 |
| 1.36 |
| 22.0 |
| 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 13 | 5.37 | 2-7 | 55 | 1.37 | 67.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 5 | 2.08 | 1-0 | 14 | 0.54 | 13.0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 23 | 4.85 | 4-9 | 88 | 1.26 | 102.0 | 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 5.07 | 2-6 | 84 | 1.38 | 87.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 14 | 3.53 | 6-3 | 65 | 1.22 | 74.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 31 | 4.36 | 8-9 | 149 | 1.30 | 161.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 13 | 2.34 | 5-2 | 58 | 1.04 | 77.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 10 | 5.36 | 2-3 | 58 | 1.37 | 45.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 23 | 3.46 | 7-5 | 116 | 1.16 | 122.1 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 20 | 4.92 | 5-6 | 98 | 1.19 | 97.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 21 | 3.84 | 12-5 | 99 | 1.12 | 124.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 12 | 4.74 | 4-6 | 69 | 1.32 | 74.0 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 10 | 2.34 | 3-4 | 46 | 1.04 | 57.2 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.