
#84 TE · Philadelphia Eagles
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'4"
Weight
226 lbs
Age
27
College
Old Dominion
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
4 yrs
TE Rank
#60 / 164
Grade Stone Smartt
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Stone Smartt grades out as a middling TE for Philadelphia Eagles (C Performance). That places him 60th of 164 graded tight ends. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 53 | 38 | 432 | 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 15 | 7 | 52 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 15 | 16 | 208 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 16 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
Guaranteed
$225K
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Stone Smartt's $1.29M deal lands at a C+ Contract Value Index, signaling a measured outcome for Philadelphia. The contract reflects the floor-level compensation appropriate for a replacement-level tight end operating in a veteran's league—the 2025 season production of 52 receiving yards across 15 games confirms Smartt remains a depth piece without reliable offensive utility, despite his converted-quarterback background providing modest intrigue in specialized packages. At $1.29M annually on a one-year term, this deal carries minimal cap risk and zero guaranteed-money commitment, which is exactly the framework you'd expect for a camp body competing for a roster spot on an established playoff team; the Eagles can walk away with zero dead cap consequences if Smartt fails to earn a regular-season role. As a fourth-year player at age 27, Smartt occupies a developmental crossroads where his trajectory is no longer ascending—the fact that fans associate him with a brutish hit on a Giants defender rather than receiving production tells you where his value proposition stands. The CVI verdict reflects the reality: this is a low-risk, low-reward flier that costs Philadelphia nothing if it fails, and offers the organization optionality if an unexpected camp breakout emerges. Unless preseason produces an outlier performance, Smartt is destined for another practice squad cycle, and the contract itself is structured precisely to accommodate that outcome without roster disruption.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Stone's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Stone Smartt's on-field production earns a C performance grade against tight end peers across the league. His 2025 season saw him accumulate 52 receiving yards across 15 games, a statistical footprint that screams replacement-level contributor rather than reliable offensive weapon. While his 4 tackles suggests he at least showed up in run defense, that modest defensive contribution cannot mask the reality that he generated virtually no impact in the passing game — the primary skill set expected from the position. As a fourth-year player competing in a crowded Eagles tight end room during the offseason, Smartt is operating as a depth piece and camp body, the kind of low-stakes signing that generates minimal internal urgency or fan enthusiasm. His pedigree as a converted quarterback may provide some theoretical utility for specialized packages, but until he demonstrates meaningful offensive production in training camp, another practice squad stint appears far more likely than a Week 1 roster spot. The media narrative around this signing has been consistently muted — five outlets covered the deal with polite indifference — because his on-field track record simply does not support elevation to a meaningful role.
Stone Smartt ranks 60th of 164 graded tight ends by performance. That slots Stone between Mo Alie-cox (C) just ahead and Kylen Granson (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Mo Alie-coxIndianapolis ColtsCMason TaylorNew York JetsCJackson HawesBuffalo BillsCGraded lower
Kylen GransonTennessee TitansStone Smartt's arrival in Philadelphia barely registers as a blip on the radar, and the C sentiment grade reflects exactly that — a low-stakes signing that generated mild coverage without any real enthusiasm or backlash. Five outlets picked up the story, and the collective tone was consistent: this is a camp body addition to a crowded tight end room, not a meaningful roster upgrade, with Smartt's background as a converted quarterback providing the only thread of genuine intrigue. That quarterback pedigree at least fuels a narrative around football IQ and potential utility in specialized packages, but it cannot offset the larger perception problem — his F performance grade signals that his on-field production has been negligible, and the 2025 season's numbers (52 receiving yards across 15 games) confirm he has operated as a replacement-level contributor rather than a reliable offensive weapon. The detail that fans most associate him with a punishing hit on a Giants player rather than any receiving production says everything about where he stands as a tight end prospect. With the Eagles sitting at 11-6 as the NFC's third seed heading into a regular season that is still months away, there is no urgency narrative pushing Smartt's stock up — he is a preseason long shot competing for a depth spot, and unless camp produces a breakout moment, another practice squad stint looks like the most likely outcome.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Stone Smartt is a player in his 4th NFL season listed at TE for the Philadelphia Eagles. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Stone Smartt, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 11 |
| 155 |
| 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 7 | 4 | 17 | 0 |
Updated Jun 11, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.