
#39 PK · Detroit Lions
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'10"
Weight
202 lbs
Age
27
College
Arkansas
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
2 yrs
PK Rank
#24 / 39
Grade Jake Bates
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jake Bates grades out as a middling PK for Detroit Lions (C- Performance). That places him 24th of 39 graded pks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 34 | 84.1% |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 79.4% |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 89.7% |
| 2023 | ![]() | 1 | 0.0% |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.1M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
Jake Bates's value math nets a C+ Contract Value Index — placing the deal in a clear band relative to the league median at PK. The contract itself is straightforward: a one-year, $1.075M agreement that reflects Detroit's pragmatic decision to retain him after tendering him as an exclusive rights free agent, a move grounded more in organizational continuity than in breakout performance. His 2025 season production—4 tackles across 17 games—aligns with the C- performance grade: a specialist role executed without distinction, which is precisely what the math says about his on-field execution. At 27 and entering his third year in the league, Bates sits squarely in the developmental-to-established window for kickers, and the Lions' willingness to lock him in signals they view him as a legitimate long-term piece rather than a placeholder awaiting competition. The disconnect between his C- performance and his B sentiment grade reflects how organizational confidence—reinforced by the recent roster additions elsewhere—can coexist with spotty consistency; a strong 2026 campaign could narrow that gap considerably and push his next contract negotiation into more comfortable territory. The one-year structure carries minimal risk either way, leaving Detroit flexibility to reassess after the season with no dead-cap liability hanging over their head.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jake's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jake Bates' performance grade lands at C-, capturing how he stacks up at PK this season. He's a below-average specialist by position standard, which reflects the inconsistency and pressure management issues that plagued his 2025 campaign—the kind of volatility you can't tolerate from a kicker, where reliability is literally the entire job description. His 2025 season saw him appear in all 17 games, which is a strength in terms of durability and availability; the Lions got a full workload from him without injury concerns. However, the four tackles he recorded is a negligible counting stat even for a kicker, signaling minimal impact on special teams coverage units—a secondary responsibility that separates above-average specialists from merely adequate ones. As a third-year player, Bates sits at a critical inflection point: the Lions' recent decision to lock him in with a new contract after tendering him as an exclusive rights free agent signals organizational confidence in his trajectory, yet the performance grade and lingering media questions about potential position competition suggest Detroit is hedging rather than all-in on his long-term ceiling. The upside narrative around him is built more on stabilizing continuity and international intrigue than on proven excellence, which means 2026 needs to be a breakout year to validate the front office's commitment and quiet the whispers about reinforcements.
Jake Bates ranks 24th of 39 graded pks by performance. That slots Jake between Cairo Santos (C) just ahead and Brandon Mcmanus (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Cairo SantosChicago BearsCGraham GanoNew York GiantsC-Evan McphersonCincinnati BengalsC-Graded lower
Brandon McmanusGreen Bay PackersFan reaction and beat coverage cluster around a B sentiment grade for Jake Bates. The narrative centers on the Lions' pragmatic decision to retain him on a new contract after tendering him as an exclusive rights free agent—a move that has drawn measured approval from both media and analysts as sensible continuity rather than a splash headline. Coverage frames Bates as having crossed a threshold from anonymous specialist to recognizable name, aided by international visibility (his Germany trip) and fantasy football interest, suggesting a quietly growing reputation among casual and serious observers alike. The one mild uncertainty threading through the discourse is whether Detroit will introduce competition at the position, though this storyline sits well short of a genuine threat narrative; instead, it reflects natural speculation rather than doubt in Bates himself. The disconnect between the positive sentiment and his C- performance grade reflects how kicker evaluation splits between organizational confidence—the Lions clearly view him as a legitimate long-term piece—and on-field inconsistency, a gap that a strong 2026 campaign could narrow considerably. With the Lions also reinforcing their roster through recent signings at receiver, linebacker, and defensive end, the front office's commitment to keeping Bates signals that special teams stability is a priority in their larger competitive framework.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jake Bates is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at PK for the Detroit Lions. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jake Bates, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C-, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D-
2025
(50% weight)
C+
2024
(30% weight)
D
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.