
#9 PK · New York Giants
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'2"
Weight
202 lbs
Age
39
College
Florida State
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
16 yrs
PK Rank
#22 / 39
Grade Graham Gano
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Graham Gano grades out as a middling PK for New York Giants (C- Performance). That places him 22nd of 39 graded pks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 123 | 83.8% |
| 2025 | ![]() | 5 | 90.0% |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 81.8% |
| 2023 | ![]() | 8 | 64.7% |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 90.6% |
| 2021 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$16.5M
Guaranteed
$11.3M
AAV
$5.5M/yr
The Giants handed Graham Gano a C CVI with this three-year, $16.5M extension ($5.5M AAV), which represents a slight overpay for a kicker entering his mid-30s with rotational player production. While Gano has been reliable during his Giants tenure, paying premium money ($11.3M guaranteed) for a position player at this performance tier creates questionable salary cap allocation, especially when younger, cheaper options typically emerge each offseason. The 35-year-old kicker's age works against the deal's backend value, as placekickers can experience rapid decline once they hit the wrong side of 35, making that guaranteed money a potential albatross. The contract structure heavily front-loads risk with nearly 70% guaranteed, giving the Giants limited flexibility if Gano's accuracy or leg strength deteriorates over the next two seasons. This feels like the kind of deal where familiarity bred comfort rather than strict value assessment—Gano provides stability, but the Giants likely could have achieved similar production at a significantly lower cost point in a kicker market that consistently offers competent veterans and promising rookies.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Graham's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Graham Gano's performance grade lands at C-, capturing how he stacks up at PK this season. At 39 years old with 16 seasons under his belt, Gano is operating well past the typical durability window for the position, and his 2025 season: 5 games appearance count underscores the central problem: availability. The repeated injury designation — a second IR stint in 2025 that triggered a failed physical and forced release — has effectively ended his tenure with New York, turning what was once a reliable veteran presence into a cautionary tale about age and durability in specialized roles. Even in the five games Gano did suit up for, the on-field execution didn't compensate for the health volatility; his D performance rating confirms that results weren't salvaging his roster spot either. The Giants now face a glaring special teams void heading into regular season preparation, with the front office scrambling to evaluate proven kicker replacements rather than riding out a veteran they could no longer count on. For a franchise already mired at 4-13, losing institutional experience at any position stings, but in Gano's case, the medical reality made the parting inevitable.
Graham Gano ranks 22nd of 39 graded pks by performance. That slots Graham between Tyler Loop (C) just ahead and Evan Mcpherson (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Tyler LoopBaltimore RavensCRiley PattersonMiami DolphinsCCairo SantosChicago BearsCGraded lower
Evan McphersonCincinnati BengalsGraham Gano's public standing with Giants fans and media has cratered to one of the ugliest sentiment readings you'll see for a longtime veteran, and given the circumstances, it's hard to argue against it. The dominant narrative across multiple outlets is a health-forced release story — a 16-year veteran who simply couldn't pass a physical, landing on injured reserve for the second time in 2025, with beat writers framing the departure as a medical inevitability rather than a performance failure. That distinction matters, because Gano's on-field production grade isn't dramatically better — a D performance rating confirms that even in his five games this season, the results weren't salvaging his roster spot. What makes the sentiment uglier than the injury alone is the broader context: fans watching a 4-13 Giants team lose yet another experienced piece from an already unstable roster are rightfully frustrated, and the "glaring special teams void" framing has dominated coverage with real urgency behind it. The recent team activity — signings like DJ Reader and Shelby Harris — signals the front office is at least trying to patch holes, but none of those moves address the kicker market, which only amplifies the perception that New York is scrambling at a critical position. The death threat headlines swirling around Gano add a genuinely disturbing layer to the discourse, underscoring just how toxic fan frustration has gotten in the building. Right now, the narrative is trending marginally upward from its floor, but this remains a cautionary tale about how quickly durability issues can erase goodwill for even the most reliable veterans.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Graham Gano is a veteran in his 16th NFL season listed at PK for the New York Giants. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Graham Gano, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C-, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 17 |
| 87.9% |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 96.9% |
| 2018 | ![]() | 12 | 87.5% |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 96.7% |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 78.9% |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 83.3% |
| 2014 | ![]() | 16 | 82.9% |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 88.9% |
| 2012 | ![]() | 6 | 81.8% |
| 2011 | ![]() | 16 | 75.6% |
| 2010 | ![]() | 16 | 68.6% |
| 2009 | ![]() | 4 | 100.0% |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C
2025
(50% weight)
D
2024
(30% weight)
F
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.