
#8SG · Sacramento Kings
Height
6'5"
Weight
200 lbs
Age
31
College
UCLA
Experience
11 yrs
Wingspan
6'8.3"
Reach
8'4.0"
Hand Size
8.25" × 8.75"
Grade Zach LaVine
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Zach LaVine grades out as a shaky SG for Sacramento Kings (D Impact). That places him 26th of 147 graded shooting guards. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D-, a slight overpay. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 693 | 19.2 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 47.9% | 39.1% | 83.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 39 | 19.2 | 2.8 | 2.3 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 39 | 19.2 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 47.9% | B B |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 74 | 23.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 51.1% | B+ B+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 25 | 19.5 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 45.2% | B+ B+ |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 77 | 24.8 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 48.5% | B+ B+ |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 67 | 24.4 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 47.6% | B+ B+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 58 | 27.4 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 50.7% | A- A- |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 60 | 25.5 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 45.0% | A- A- |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 63 | 23.7 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 46.7% | A- A- |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 24 | 16.7 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 38.3% | B B |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 47 | 18.9 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 45.9% | B B |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 82 | 14.0 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 45.2% | B- B- |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 77 | 10.1 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 42.2% | C C |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
2 years
Total Value
$96.5M
Guaranteed
$96.5M
AAV
$47.5M/yr
Earning a D- Contract Value Index, Zach LaVine's 2-year pact reflects Sacramento's read on rotation impact. At $47.5M annually, LaVine remains an above-average offensive weapon—his 2025-26 season shows 19.2 PPG across 39 games, a clear validation of his scoring tier—yet the contract's weight far exceeds the Kings' appetite for his role in a roster that has pivoted toward guard depth signings in recent weeks. For a 31-year-old established veteran at shooting guard, $47.5M sits at the premium end of the positional market, and without championship-window urgency or playoff seeding to justify the outlay, that annual figure functions as an organizational straightjacket rather than an investment in a core piece. His B performance grade and B- sentiment confirm LaVine remains a legitimate above-average contributor, but the narrative framing—dominated by trade speculation, injury concerns, and Sacramento's publicly acknowledged desire to move on—reveals a fundamental misalignment between his contract cost and the franchise's rebuilding priorities. With the Kings sitting at 14th seed in the West and no postseason relevance this season, the two-year structure compounds the problem: LaVine's $48.9M player option decision carries outsized transactional weight, and every on-court performance is filtered through the lens of departability rather than future fit. The D- CVI grade captures this disconnect—a franchise-caliber scoring talent on paper, but one whose salary and injury history have rendered him a liability in Sacramento's current organizational landscape.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Zach's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Zach LaVine ranks 26th of 147 graded shooting guards by performance. That slots Zach between Isaiah Joe (B) just ahead and Quentin Grimes (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Isaiah JoeOklahoma City ThunderBJavonte GreenDetroit PistonsBDylan HarperSan Antonio SpursBGraded lower
Quentin GrimesPhiladelphia SixersNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Zach LaVine is a veteran in his 11th NBA season listed at SG for the Sacramento Kings. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Zach LaVine, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D-, Performance B, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.7 |
| 0.3 |
| 47.9% |
| 39.0% |
| 88.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 74 | 23.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 51.1% | 44.6% | 82.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 25 | 19.5 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 45.2% | 34.9% | 85.4% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 77 | 24.8 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 48.5% | 37.5% | 84.8% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 67 | 24.4 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 47.6% | 38.9% | 85.3% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 58 | 27.4 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 50.7% | 41.9% | 84.9% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 60 | 25.5 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 45.0% | 38.0% | 80.2% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 63 | 23.7 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 46.7% | 37.4% | 83.2% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 24 | 16.7 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 38.3% | 34.1% | 81.3% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 47 | 18.9 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 45.9% | 38.7% | 83.6% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 82 | 14.0 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 45.2% | 38.9% | 79.3% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 77 | 10.1 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 42.2% | 34.1% | 84.2% |
Zach LaVine earns a B Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level shooting guard putting up solid numbers for the Sacramento Kings. This season, Zach is putting up 19.2 points, 2.8 rebounds, and 2.3 assists per game across 693 games. Zach's strongest area is PPG at 19.2, which compares favorably to the shooting guard median of 15.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 2.8 (shooting guard median: 5.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Zach ranks 26th. Zach is a reliable contributor who the Sacramento Kings can count on game to game.
Zach LaVine carries a B- sentiment grade right now, with NBA media framing his role on Sacramento as a departure waiting to happen rather than a cornerstone piece. The dominant narrative centers on his $47.5 million salary as a constraint on the Kings' flexibility and his injury-hampered tenure in Sacramento, overshadowing what remains a legitimate on-court contribution: across the 2025-26 season, he's averaging 19.2 points per game in 39 games, well above replacement-level production for a shooting guard at 31 years old. Yet there's a clear disconnect between his B performance grade and the transactional urgency surrounding his player option decision—media speculation about reunions with Chicago and other suitors now commands more attention than his actual scoring output, transforming him from a talent evaluation into a chess piece in Sacramento's rebuild calculus. Recent Kings roster moves—signings of DaQuan Jeffries and Killian Hayes in late March—signal organizational hedging rather than a commitment, further cementing the narrative that the front office has already moved on, even as headlines alternately frame a LaVine trade as both an "albatross" and a potential "sneaky ploy" for contenders. With Sacramento stuck at 14th seed in the West and no playoff relevance in sight, LaVine's immediate future has become decoupled from his performance; the sentiment climb to B reflects genuine acknowledgment of his résumé and current-season numbers, but it remains tethered to the looming decision rather than confidence in his role going forward.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.