
#11SG · Oklahoma City Thunder
Height
6'4"
Weight
165 lbs
Age
26
College
Arkansas
Experience
5 yrs
Wingspan
6'7.5"
Reach
8'5.0"
Hand Size
8.25" × 8.25"
Grade Isaiah Joe
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Isaiah Joe grades out as an excellent SG for Oklahoma City Thunder (A- Impact). That places him 23rd of 147 graded shooting guards. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 392 | 11.1 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 45.5% | 40.6% | 85.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 71 | 11.1 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 71 | 11.1 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 45.5% | C+ C+ |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 74 | 10.2 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 44.0% | C+ C+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 78 | 8.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 45.8% | C C |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 73 | 9.5 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 44.1% | C C |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 55 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 35.0% | F F |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 41 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 36.1% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 5/29 | @ SAS | L 91-118 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-4 | -6 |
| Wed, 5/27 | vs SAS | W 127-114 | 2 | 0 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$35.0M
Guaranteed
$23.7M
AAV
$12.4M/yr
Isaiah Joe's Contract Value Index lands at B, putting the deal in a clear band of comparable signings. At $12.4M AAV over three years, Joe is being paid as a solid rotation contributor—well below max territory, but meaningfully above replacement-level wages—and his B performance grade justifies that positioning. The 2025-26 season numbers tell the story: 11.1 PPG across 71 games on a 64-win Thunder team underscores his role as a high-efficiency, low-usage weapon rather than a ball-handler or creation engine, which aligns perfectly with the deal's structure. As a 26-year-old six-year veteran, Joe is in his prime earning window, and a three-year commitment at this price point reflects confidence in his ability to remain productive in a defined role—exactly what the Thunder appear to be banking on. The media narrative around Joe has swung decisively positive, framing his elite three-point shooting not as a complementary luxury but as a genuine defensive headache for opponents, which validates the front office's investment in continuity. With the Finals ten days away and the Thunder as the West's top seed, Joe's deal carries meaningful postseason stakes; if his shooting holds up through a deep run, this contract will look like value execution by OKC's front office, but drought stretches would expose the limitations of paying a role player at this rate for three consecutive seasons.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Isaiah's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Isaiah Joe ranks 23rd of 147 graded shooting guards by performance. That slots Isaiah between VJ Edgecombe (B) just ahead and Dylan Harper (B) just behind.
Graded higher
VJ EdgecombePhiladelphia SixersBGary Payton IIGolden State WarriorsBAnfernee SimonsChicago BullsBGraded lower
Dylan HarperSan Antonio SpursNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Isaiah Joe is a player in his 5th NBA season listed at SG for the Oklahoma City Thunder. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Isaiah Joe, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.7 |
| 0.2 |
| 45.5% |
| 42.3% |
| 89.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 74 | 10.2 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 44.0% | 41.2% | 82.1% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 78 | 8.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 45.8% | 41.6% | 86.5% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 73 | 9.5 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 44.1% | 40.9% | 82.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 55 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 35.0% | 33.3% | 93.5% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 41 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 36.1% | 36.8% | 75.0% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| -4 |
| Mon, 5/25 | @ SAS | L 82-103 | 19 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-7 | +6 |
| Sat, 5/23 | @ SAS | W 123-108 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -2 |
| Thu, 5/21 | vs SAS | W 122-113 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | +1 |
| Tue, 5/19 | vs SAS | L 115-122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Tue, 5/12 | @ LAL | W 115-110 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | -12 |
| Sun, 5/10 | @ LAL | W 131-108 | 18 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4-7 | 4-6 | -2 |
| Fri, 5/8 | vs LAL | W 125-107 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 | -1 |
Isaiah Joe earns a B Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level shooting guard putting up solid numbers for the Oklahoma City Thunder. Through 392 games, Isaiah is contributing 11.1 points, 2.5 rebounds, and 1.3 assists per game in his role. Isaiah's best relative area is FG% at 45.5, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.3 (shooting guard median: 4.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Isaiah ranks 23rd. Isaiah is a reliable contributor who the Oklahoma City Thunder can count on game to game.
Isaiah Joe's public profile heading into the playoffs sits at a B+ sentiment grade — meaningfully ahead of where his on-court production grades out, and a reflection of how effectively the broader basketball media has embraced him as a legitimate piece of something real in Oklahoma City. The narrative driving that perception is hard to argue with: analysts and beat reporters have framed his elite three-point shooting not as a complementary luxury but as a genuine tactical problem for opposing defenses, and outlets have placed him alongside key Thunder contributors as a meaningful pillar of the team's winning formula rather than a depth piece quietly cashing checks. That sentiment premium over his C+ performance grade makes some sense given the nature of his role — a high-efficiency shooter on a 64-win team doesn't need to dominate box scores to earn respect, and his 11.1 points per game across 71 games in the 2025-26 season backs up the idea that he's a consistent, deployable weapon rather than a situational one. The one credible dent in the armor — a non-start against New York — barely registered as a negative in the broader coverage, which tells you how much goodwill he's accumulated. Recent roster shuffling around him, including the signing of Payton Sandfort and a series of roster cuts, signals a front office still fine-tuning the margins, but none of those moves directly threaten Joe's standing in the rotation. With the Thunder as the West's top seed and the Finals weeks away, the stakes of his continued production have never been higher, and the media framing reflects that pressure as opportunity rather than burden. The bottom line: Joe enters the postseason as one of the more positively perceived role players in the league relative to his statistical profile, and sustaining that momentum now depends entirely on whether the shooting holds up when the lights get brightest.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.