
#27PG · Portland Trail Blazers
Height
6'8"
Weight
195 lbs
Age
25
Experience
4 yrs
Grade Vit Krejci
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Vit Krejci grades out as a shaky PG for Portland Trail Blazers (D+ Impact). That places him 70th of 93 graded point guards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 202 | 8.6 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 44.8% | 39.3% | 75.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 64 | 8.6 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 64 | 8.6 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 44.8% | D- D- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 57 | 7.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 49.7% | D- D- |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 22 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 49.0% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 29 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 40.5% | F F |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 30 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 40.7% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | @ SAS | L 95-114 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | +1 |
| Sun, 4/26 | vs SAS | L 93-114 | 2 | 0 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$8.0M
Guaranteed
$5.0M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
The C- Contract Value Index on Vit Krejci's deal stems from how production lines up against the cap hit. On a $2.35M AAV over three years, Krejci is paying guard wages for rotational-wing output: his 2025-26 numbers of 8.6 PPG, 2.3 RPG, and 1.6 APG across 64 games read as solid depth production, not the breakout that would justify the pre-trade optimism that framed his acquisition from Atlanta as a "genius deal." The gap between that pre-season enthusiasm and his current role is precisely where the CVI grade lives—he's not underpaid, but he's not delivering the developmental leap Portland's media coverage seemed to forecast when the Blazers gave up draft capital to get him. At 25 years old as a 5-year veteran, Krejci sits in that murky tier where career trajectory is increasingly defined by opportunity and fit rather than age-curve upside, and Portland's recent roster moves—including depth signings that suggest the organization is actively managing rotation minutes—indicate he's competing for stability rather than commanding it. The real CVI drag, however, is the tonal collapse from the trade narrative: media sentiment has cooled from A- to B- because his production has not validated the centerpiece framing, and with the Blazers now at 42-40 and playoff seeding real, his contract no longer looks like a developmental investment—it looks like a rotation piece on a marginal postseason team, which is a fundamentally different value proposition than what the initial coverage promised.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Vit's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Vit Krejci ranks 70th of 93 graded point guards by performance. That slots Vit between Mike Conley (D-) just ahead and RayJ Dennis (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
Mike ConleyMinnesota TimberwolvesD-Jamal SheadToronto RaptorsD-Jordan GoodwinPhoenix SunsD-Graded lower
RayJ DennisAtlanta HawksNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Vit Krejci is a player in his 4th NBA season listed at PG for the Portland Trail Blazers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Vit Krejci, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D-, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.7 |
| 0.3 |
| 44.8% |
| 39.1% |
| 74.5% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 57 | 7.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 49.7% | 43.7% | 71.1% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 22 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 49.0% | 41.2% | 83.3% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 29 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 40.5% | 23.8% | 50.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 30 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 40.7% | 32.7% | 86.4% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| -2 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs SAS | L 108-120 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 |
| Mon, 4/20 | @ SAS | L 98-111 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs SAC | W 122-110 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 | +2 |
Vit Krejci earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA point guards this season. Through 202 games, Vit is contributing 8.6 points, 2.3 rebounds, and 1.6 assists per game in his role. Vit's best relative area is FG% at 44.8, though it still falls below the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.6 (point guard median: 4.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Vit ranks 70th.
Vit Krejci's public standing sits at a B- sentiment grade — cautiously positive but beginning to cool, a reflection of a narrative that was built on trade optimism and has since collided with the realities of a C- performance grade through 64 games in the 2025-26 season. The initial media reception surrounding his acquisition from Atlanta was genuinely enthusiastic, with analysts framing the deal as a value win for Portland, characterizing Krejci as the centerpiece of the exchange rather than an ancillary piece and suggesting that suppressed opportunity in Atlanta — not a ceiling problem — explained his limited production to that point. That pre-season goodwill has been the primary support beam for his reputation, because his 2025-26 numbers — 8.6 PPG, 2.3 RPG, and 1.6 APG across 64 games — are the output of a solid rotation piece, not the breakout that would validate the "genius deal" framing some coverage embraced at the time of the trade. With Portland sitting at 42-40 as the No. 7 seed in the West and the playoffs looming, the franchise is no longer in a pure developmental posture, which raises the stakes for Krejci to contribute meaningfully rather than simply log minutes. Recent roster movement — including the signings of Chris Youngblood and Jayson Kent alongside Sidy Cissoko's extension — suggests the organization is actively managing depth, and that kind of roster churn can subtly shift perception around fringe contributors like Krejci, making it harder for him to own a clearly defined role in the public eye. The bottom line is that Krejci remains viewed as a legitimate rotation asset with legitimate upside, but the gap between the trade hype and his current production line is wide enough that sentiment has trended from an A- down to a B-, and without a postseason moment to point to, that drift is more likely to continue than reverse.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.