
#67C · Memphis Grizzlies
Height
6'9"
Weight
232 lbs
Age
40
College
USC
Experience
15 yrs
Wingspan
7'4.0"
Reach
9'1.0"
Grade Taj Gibson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Taj Gibson grades out as a middling C for Memphis Grizzlies (C+ Impact). That places him 56th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 15+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1006 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 41.7% | 27.0% | 71.2% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.2 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 41.7% | F F |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 37 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 49.5% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 20 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 40.5% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 49 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 52.0% | F F |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 52 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 51.8% | D- D- |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 5 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 60.0% | C+ C+ |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 6.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 58.4% | D- D- |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 70 | 10.8 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 56.6% | C C |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 5 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 63.6% | F F |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 5 | 9.8 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 60.0% | F F |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 73 | 8.6 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 52.6% | C C |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 12 | 7.4 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 47.2% | D+ D+ |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 5 | 18.2 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 56.1% | C+ C+ |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 12 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 47.0% | D D |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 6 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 0.7 | 45.7% | C C |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 16 | 5.9 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 56.6% | C- C- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ HOU | L 101-132 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | -7 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ DEN | L 119-136 | 5 | 2 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$4.1M
Guaranteed
$4.1M
AAV
$2.1M/yr
Memphis got a C Contract Value Index out of the Taj Gibson deal because rotation impact tracks with the AAV. At 40 years old and 17 seasons into a legendary career, Gibson earned his All-Rookie 1st Team honor back in 2010, but he is now squarely in the replacement-level phase of his arc—the 2025-26 season reflects exactly that tier, with 2.6 points and 2.6 rebounds across five games, confirming he is a depth piece functioning almost purely as locker-room ballast rather than a statistical contributor. The $2.1M annual salary is appropriate for a veteran minimum–adjacent contract anchoring a backup big slot, and at two years it carries minimal risk in a market where teams routinely overpay for younger rotation players; what you're paying for here is stability and experience, not upside. Memphis's recent transaction pattern—cycling through 10-day signings like Lucas Williamson, Adama Bal, and Dariq Whitehead while sitting at 25-57—makes clear the organization is in evaluation mode, and Gibson fits that posture perfectly: a longtime veteran lending credibility and professionalism to a young core in a lost season, the kind of signing that costs next to nothing against the cap while generating genuine goodwill across the league. The media framing has been uniformly respectful, treating Gibson as a historic longevity milestone rather than a roster gamble, and that narrative alignment keeps the deal from feeling like organizational desperation. For a player of his career stage and current production profile, this is a sensible value match—neither a steal nor an overpay, just a straightforward acknowledgment that veteran presence has a place on rebuilding rosters.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Taj's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Taj Gibson ranks 56th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Taj between Steven Adams (C-) just ahead and Andre Drummond (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Steven AdamsHouston RocketsC-Kevon LooneyNew Orleans PelicansD+Rocco ZikarskyMinnesota TimberwolvesD+Graded lower
Andre DrummondPhiladelphia SixersNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Taj Gibson is a veteran in his 15th NBA season listed at C for the Memphis Grizzlies. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Taj Gibson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance D+, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.2 |
| 0.2 |
| 41.7% |
| 50.0% |
| 50.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 37 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 49.5% | 50.0% | 60.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 20 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 40.5% | 20.0% | 100.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 49 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 52.0% | 33.3% | 71.4% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 52 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 51.8% | 39.5% | 80.8% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 5 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 60.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 6.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 58.4% | 28.6% | 73.2% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 70 | 10.8 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 56.6% | 32.4% | 75.7% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 5 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 63.6% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 5 | 9.8 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 60.0% | 0.0% | 87.5% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 73 | 8.6 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 52.6% | 0.0% | 69.2% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 12 | 7.4 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 47.2% | 0.0% | 70.0% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 5 | 18.2 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 56.1% | 0.0% | 75.0% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 12 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 47.0% | 0.0% | 72.7% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 6 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 45.7% | 0.0% | 68.2% |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 16 | 5.9 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 56.6% | 0.0% | 60.0% |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 5 | 7.6 | 7.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 42.1% | 0.0% | 54.5% |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1-3 |
| 0-0 |
| +1 |
| Sun, 4/5 | @ MIL | L 115-131 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +4 |
Taj Gibson earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 1006 games, Taj is contributing 2.6 points, 2.6 rebounds, and 0.2 assists per game in his role. Taj's best relative area is FG% at 41.7, though it still falls below the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.2 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Taj ranks 56th.
Memphis Grizzlies fans and NBA writers have settled into a C+ sentiment grade on Taj Gibson. The narrative around his multi-year deal has been uniformly celebratory—framed as a milestone achievement rather than a roster acquisition, with genuine warmth surrounding his status as only the 35th player in league history to appear in an NBA game at age 40, a distinction that generates goodwill across the basketball community. That reverence for longevity is doing heavy lifting, because his on-court production in the 2025-26 season (2.6 PPG, 2.6 RPG across five games) reflects the replacement-level performance grade and confirms his value to Memphis is almost entirely atmospheric: mentorship, professionalism, and rim-running rather than statistical impact. With the Grizzlies mired at 25-57 and cycling through developmental signings—Dariq Whitehead, Adama Bal, Lucas Williamson—the team's late-season roster churn actually reinforces Gibson's unstated role, which is to model veteran stability for a young core still finding its footing in a lost season. The sentiment has cooled slightly over the past 30 days, a natural arc once the feel-good signing narrative exhausts its shelf life, but Gibson remains genuinely respected rather than criticized—a quiet distinction that matters when a replacement-level contributor generates this level of goodwill in a struggling franchise.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.