
#11C · Los Angeles Lakers
Height
7'0"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
26
College
Texas
Experience
6 yrs
Wingspan
7'3.5"
Reach
9'2.5"
Hand Size
9.25" × 10.5"
Grade Jaxson Hayes
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jaxson Hayes grades out as an excellent C for Los Angeles Lakers (A- Impact). That places him 62nd of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 426 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 74.4% | 27.4% | 69.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 60 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 0.9 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 60 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 74.4% | D D |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 4 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 37.5% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 4 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.0% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 47 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 55.1% | F F |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 6 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 56.0% | F F |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 60 | 7.5 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 62.5% | D D |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 64 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 67.2% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 5/12 | vs OKC | L 110-115 | 27 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 | -1 |
| Sun, 5/10 | vs OKC | L 108-131 | 9 | 1 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.4M
Guaranteed
$3.4M
AAV
$3.4M/yr
Net of age, position, and term, Jaxson Hayes' deal earns a C+ Contract Value Index. At $3.4M AAV on a one-year deal, the contract itself presents minimal financial risk for the Lakers — a backup center at that price point is fungible in today's market — but the C+ grade reflects the fundamental misalignment between what Hayes is paid to do and what his on-court performance has actually delivered. Across the 2025-26 season, Hayes logged 6.8 PPG, 4.0 RPG, and 0.9 APG over 60 games, a profile that lands squarely in the functional-depth tier: useful finishing and shot-blocking instincts in limited minutes, but without the counting production or All-Star trajectory that would justify deeper investment. At 26 years old and already seven seasons into his career, Hayes occupies the gray zone of a journeyman contributor — past the point of upside-driven evaluation, not yet entrenched as a proven rotation anchor — which makes the one-year structure actually prudent for Los Angeles rather than punitive. The sentiment headwinds he's facing (anchored by the off-court mascot suspension that overshadowed his actual utility) don't change the contract math, but they do signal that any future investment beyond this deal would hinge entirely on production rather than narrative goodwill. For a team in the playoff hunt, this is exactly the kind of low-commitment depth allocation you want — no overpay, no long-term cap creep, just a functional backup locked in at market rate.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jaxson's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jaxson Hayes ranks 62nd of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Jaxson between Kyle Filipowski (D+) just ahead and Lachlan Olbrich (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Kyle FilipowskiUtah JazzD+Trayce Jackson-DavisToronto RaptorsD+Vladislav GoldinMiami HeatD+Graded lower
Lachlan OlbrichNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jaxson Hayes is a player in his 6th NBA season listed at C for the Los Angeles Lakers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jaxson Hayes, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance D+, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.4 |
| 0.7 |
| 74.4% |
| 100.0% |
| 64.3% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 4 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 37.5% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 4 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 47 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 55.1% | 10.3% | 69.9% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 6 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 56.0% | 0.0% | 63.6% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 60 | 7.5 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 62.5% | 42.9% | 77.5% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 64 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 67.2% | 25.0% | 64.7% |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| -5 |
| Fri, 5/8 | @ OKC | L 107-125 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | -11 |
| Wed, 5/6 | @ OKC | L 90-108 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | -12 |
| Sat, 5/2 | @ HOU | W 98-78 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | +21 |
| Thu, 4/30 | vs HOU | L 93-99 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -8 |
| Mon, 4/27 | @ HOU | L 96-115 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | -4 |
| Sat, 4/25 | @ HOU | W 112-108 | 20 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-0 | +7 |
| Wed, 4/22 | vs HOU | W 101-94 | 21 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | +12 |
| Sun, 4/19 | vs HOU | W 107-98 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | +2 |
Jaxson Hayes earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 426 games, Jaxson is contributing 6.8 points, 4.0 rebounds, and 0.9 assists per game in his role. Jaxson's strongest area is FG% at 74.4, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.9 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Jaxson ranks 62nd.
Inside the Los Angeles Lakers ecosystem, the take on Jaxson Hayes settles at a D- sentiment grade. The dominant narrative surrounding the 26-year-old center isn't his utility as a rim-running lob threat or his elite finishing efficiency — it's an NBA-issued one-game suspension for shoving the Washington Wizards mascot G-Wiz before a game, an incident that generated widespread ridicule and proved remarkably sticky in the news cycle, the kind of absurd off-court distraction that follows a fringe rotation player far longer than it would a star. That reputational drag feels particularly unfair when measured against his actual on-court output: across 60 games in the 2025-26 season, Hayes logged 6.8 PPG, 4.0 RPG, and 0.9 APG, painting the picture of a functional backup center doing unspectacular but legitimate work rather than a liability dragging the team down. Recent headlines have split between the mascot suspension dominating the cycle and occasional positive notes — a reported breakout stretch that prompted the Lakers to recalibrate center depth alongside Deandre Ayton, plus Slam Dunk Contest participation and public praise from head coach JJ Redick — but none of those bright spots have cut through the embarrassing off-court moment enough to materially shift the conversation. With the Lakers locked in at 53-29 as the four-seed heading into the playoffs and playoff stakes rising by the day, Hayes' public profile remains defined more by controversy than contribution, leaving him positioned as an "interesting depth piece" rather than a defined postseason narrative either way.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.