
#35C · Portland Trail Blazers
Height
6'9"
Weight
249 lbs
Age
28
College
Texas A&M
Experience
7 yrs
Grade Robert Williams III
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Robert Williams III grades out as an excellent C for Portland Trail Blazers (A Impact). That places him 11th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is excellent (A- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A-, a clear bargain. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 284 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 72.0% | 29.6% | 67.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 50 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 1.0 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 50 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 72.0% | B- B- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 20 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 64.1% | C+ C+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 65.4% | C C |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 7.7 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 78.8% | C- C- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 17 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 67.9% | C C |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 3 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 64.3% | C- C- |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 13 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 74.2% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | @ SAS | L 95-114 | 17 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5-10 | 1-3 | -4 |
| Sun, 4/26 | vs SAS | L 93-114 | 26 | 4 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$13.3M
Guaranteed
$13.3M
AAV
$13.3M/yr
Earning an A- Contract Value Index, Robert Williams III's 1-year pact reflects Portland's read on rotation impact during a critical playoff push. At $13.3M AAV for an established veteran entering his ninth season, the deal represents smart positional value — a defensive anchor operating at B+ performance tier who delivered 6.8 PPG, 7.0 RPG, and 1.0 APG across 50 games in the 2025-26 season, the kind of unspectacular-but-functional production that justifies mid-tier rotation spending without breaking the bank. The CVI grade acknowledges what the Blazers clearly calculated: Williams' availability this season has been materially improved, his health narrative has genuinely shifted from chronic concern to cautious optimism, and a one-year structure offers maximum flexibility if durability questions resurface. That said, the underlying sentiment captures the real tension — media and team observers alike are already gaming out "replacement-from-the-draft" contingency plans, a signal that even Portland's front office is hedging against the possibility that his body won't hold up across a full playoff run and into next season. With the Blazers at 42-40 and the Finals just 10 days away, Williams finds himself in that interesting postseason limbo: a legitimately valuable contributor whose CVI grade reflects his actual impact, but whose future with the franchise remains genuinely unresolved because durability, not contract math, is the variable Portland can't yet control.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Robert's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Robert Williams III ranks 11th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Robert between Donovan Clingan (B+) just ahead and Jakob Poeltl (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Donovan ClinganPortland Trail BlazersB+Joel EmbiidPhiladelphia SixersB+Bam AdebayoMiami HeatB+Graded lower
Jakob PoeltlToronto RaptorsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Robert Williams III is a player in his 7th NBA season listed at C for the Portland Trail Blazers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Robert Williams III, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A-, Performance B+, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 1.5 |
| 72.0% |
| 33.3% |
| 62.8% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 20 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 64.1% | 33.3% | 88.2% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 65.4% | 0.0% | 77.8% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 7.7 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 78.8% | 0.0% | 67.9% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 17 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 67.9% | 0.0% | 89.3% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 3 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 64.3% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 13 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 74.2% | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 3 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 6 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 2-4 |
| 0-0 |
| +3 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs SAS | L 108-120 | 25 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-1 | -11 |
| Wed, 4/22 | @ SAS | W 106-103 | 23 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5-6 | 1-2 | +13 |
| Mon, 4/20 | @ SAS | L 98-111 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5-7 | 1-3 | +3 |
| Wed, 4/15 | @ PHX | W 114-110 | 16 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-1 | -14 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs SAC | W 122-110 | 23 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | +7 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs LAC | W 116-97 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-2 | +25 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ SAS | L 101-112 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | -11 |
| Tue, 4/7 | @ DEN | L 132-137 | 23 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0 |
Robert Williams III earns a B+ Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level center putting up solid numbers for the Portland Trail Blazers. Through 284 games, Robert is contributing 6.8 points, 7.0 rebounds, and 1.0 assists per game in his role. Robert's strongest area is FG% at 72.0, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.0 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Robert ranks 11th. Robert is a reliable contributor who the Portland Trail Blazers can count on game to game.
Robert Williams III carries a B sentiment grade right now, with NBA media framing his role on the Portland Trail Blazers as a feel-good redemption arc undercut by persistent durability concerns. The narrative has genuinely shifted in his favor after a season in which observers credited his defensive presence and playoff-caliber production with reminding the league of his peak value—specifically his All-Defensive Second Team recognition from 2022, which remains the ceiling reference point that reporters keep circling back to when evaluating his ceiling. That optimism, however, is tempered by a chronic asterisk: knee concerns have turned every availability update into news, and coverage explicitly questions whether Portland will retain him, introducing roster uncertainty that caps how high his public standing can climb. His 2025-26 season numbers—6.8 PPG, 7.0 RPG, and 1.0 APG across 50 games—read as solid, functional rotation production rather than a difference-maker, which aligns neatly with his B- performance grade and justifies why recent headlines have surfaced a "replacement hiding in the draft" narrative, suggesting the front office and media are already stress-testing contingency plans. With the Blazers sitting at 42-40 as the No. 7 seed heading into the playoffs, Williams finds himself in an interesting spot: performance is trending upward and sentiment has recovered sharply from recent lows, but the draft-centered replacement chatter is a real ceiling on how high his standing can climb until he proves he can sustain availability when playoff minutes intensify.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.