
#15C · Phoenix Suns
Height
7'1"
Weight
240 lbs
Age
24
College
Duke
Experience
3 yrs
Wingspan
7'6.5"
Reach
9'9.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9.75"
Grade Mark Williams
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Mark Williams grades out as an excellent C for Phoenix Suns (A- Impact). That places him 14th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is excellent (A- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A-, a clear bargain. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 166 | 11.7 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 64.4% | 20.0% | 76.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 60 | 11.7 | 8.0 | 1.0 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 60 | 11.7 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 64.4% | B- B- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 44 | 15.3 | 10.2 | 2.5 | 60.4% | B+ B+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 19 | 12.7 | 9.7 | 1.2 | 64.9% | B- B- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 43 | 9.0 | 7.1 | 0.4 | 63.7% | C C |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/15 | vs POR | L 110-114 | 22 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | -2 |
| Sat, 4/11 | @ LAL | L 73-101 | 20 | 7 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$6.3M
Guaranteed
$6.3M
AAV
$6.3M/yr
Cap-table math on Mark Williams's contract works out to a A- Contract Value Index given term and player option structure. At $6.3M annually on a one-year deal, Williams represents genuinely elite value for a fourth-year center posting 11.7 PPG and 8.0 RPG on 60 games during the 2025-26 season—efficiency metrics that rival many starters despite his complementary role. For a 24-year-old producing at a B+ performance level, this contract is a steal from a pure salary-to-output perspective; he's absorbing minimal cap real estate while delivering above-average production, which is precisely what franchise-caliber contract construction looks like. The CVI benefit here derives from the term structure: a single year at this AAV creates no long-term anchor and preserves maximum roster flexibility heading into free agency, a critical advantage given the Suns' stated uncertainty about his fit. However, mediaFraming reveals the organizational disconnect—despite the on-court merit, front-office perception has shifted toward viewing him as a "mistake" requiring correction, which undercuts the otherwise pristine contract value proposition and signals the team may not retain him regardless of financial merit. The injury absence during the Oklahoma City playoff series has only reinforced questions about reliability, dampening what would otherwise be an uncomplicated keep-and-develop decision. For pure contract value, Williams delivers an A- grade; for team alignment and future construction, that grade becomes increasingly theoretical if Phoenix continues signaling a desire to move on.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Mark's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Mark Williams ranks 14th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Mark between Robert Williams III (B+) just ahead and Nic Claxton (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Robert Williams IIIPortland Trail BlazersB+Jakob PoeltlToronto RaptorsB+Isaiah HartensteinOklahoma City ThunderB+Graded lower
Nic ClaxtonBrooklyn NetsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Mark Williams is a player in his 3rd NBA season listed at C for the Phoenix Suns. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Mark Williams, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A-, Performance B+, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.9 |
| 0.9 |
| 64.4% |
| 100.0% |
| 77.1% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 44 | 15.3 | 10.2 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 60.4% | 0.0% | 80.4% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 19 | 12.7 | 9.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 64.9% | 0.0% | 71.9% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 43 | 9.0 | 7.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 63.7% | 0.0% | 69.1% |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2-2 |
| 0-0 |
| -20 |
| Wed, 4/8 | vs HOU | L 105-119 | 28 | 19 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7-9 | 0-0 | +10 |
Mark Williams earns a B+ Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level center putting up solid numbers for the Phoenix Suns. Through 166 games, Mark is contributing 11.7 points, 8.0 rebounds, and 1.0 assists per game in his role. Mark's strongest area is RPG at 8.0, which compares favorably to the center median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.0 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Mark ranks 14th. At 24, Mark is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Phoenix Suns.
Mark Williams is a quietly respected contributor with solid B-level production and strong career metrics. Injury management dominates recent narrative, but return timelines suggest growing confidence in his availability. At $6.3M annually, he represents solid value as a complementary big man. Media coverage remains largely neutral-to-positive, reflecting his role as a reliable role player. Fan perception appears patient; no trade noise or controversy undermines his standing.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.