
#33PF · Los Angeles Clippers
Height
6'7"
Weight
230 lbs
Age
37
Experience
17 yrs
Grade Nicolas Batum
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Nicolas Batum grades out as a shaky PF for Los Angeles Clippers (D Impact). That places him 56th of 84 graded power forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a significant overpay (F), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 17+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1196 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 39.9% | 37.0% | 83.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 66 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 0.9 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 66 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 39.9% | F F |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 7 | 5.6 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 39.4% | C+ C+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 41.4% | C C |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 5 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 42.1% | D- D- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 59 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 46.3% | C+ C+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 19 | 8.1 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 48.6% | C+ C+ |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 22 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 34.6% | D D |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 75 | 9.3 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 45.0% | C+ C+ |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 64 | 11.6 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 41.5% | C+ C+ |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 77 | 15.1 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 40.3% | B- B- |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 5 | 11.4 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 37.8% | D- D- |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 5 | 14.2 | 8.6 | 5.2 | 34.3% | C C |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 11 | 15.2 | 7.6 | 4.8 | 47.2% | B B |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 73 | 14.3 | 5.6 | 4.9 | 42.3% | B B |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 59 | 13.9 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 45.1% | C+ C+ |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 6 | 8.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 41.3% | D+ D+ |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 6 | 8.2 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 45.9% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | vs GSW | W 115-110 | 22 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 3-5 | +10 |
| Sat, 4/11 | @ POR | L 97-116 | 5 | 0 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$11.5M
Guaranteed
$11.5M
AAV
$5.6M/yr
Nicolas Batum's value math nets an F Contract Value Index relative to the league median at PF. At $5.6M AAV on a two-year deal, Batum is being paid like a solid rotation piece, but his 2025-26 production—4.0 PPG, 2.6 RPG, 0.9 APG across 66 games—reads as replacement-level output that doesn't justify even a veteran's salary at age 37. The disconnect between his modest contract and his on-court return is the core problem: a D performance grade reflects diminished athleticism and role compression, and while positional markets for power forwards at this price point typically expect at least average starter-caliber availability and output, Batum is delivering less. What complicates the CVI verdict is the intangible layer—his B sentiment grade reflects genuine organizational trust in his locker-room leadership and system-stabilization role during a difficult stretch, a reputation built over 18 seasons that clearly holds weight with the Clippers' front office, as suggested by recent reporting around a potential "Batum decision" on his future. However, character capital and contract value are separate currencies; the F grade acknowledges that on the court, the Clippers are not getting market-rate production for their spend, no matter how steady his presence has become off it. With Los Angeles at 42-40 and playoff stakes tightening, the organization may continue to value him as a stabilizing veteran voice, but from a pure contract-value lens, paying $5.6M annually for replacement-level play and minimal counting stats is a below-market allocation, especially with two years still on the deal.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Nicolas's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Nicolas Batum ranks 56th of 84 graded power forwards by performance. That slots Nicolas between Danny Wolf (D) just ahead and Larry Nance Jr. (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Danny WolfBrooklyn NetsDOlivier-Maxence ProsperMemphis GrizzliesDJabari WalkerPhiladelphia SixersDGraded lower
Larry Nance Jr.No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Nicolas Batum is a veteran in his 17th NBA season listed at PF for the Los Angeles Clippers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Nicolas Batum, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance D, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.7 |
| 0.3 |
| 39.9% |
| 39.7% |
| 81.8% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 7 | 5.6 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 39.4% | 39.4% | 0.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 41.4% | 40.9% | 62.5% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 5 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 42.1% | 35.3% | 0.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 59 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 46.3% | 40.0% | 65.8% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 19 | 8.1 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 48.6% | 38.9% | 82.6% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 22 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 34.6% | 28.6% | 90.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 75 | 9.3 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 45.0% | 38.9% | 86.5% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 64 | 11.6 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 41.5% | 33.6% | 83.1% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 77 | 15.1 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 40.3% | 33.3% | 85.6% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 5 | 11.4 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 37.8% | 27.3% | 85.0% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 5 | 14.2 | 8.6 | 5.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 34.3% | 33.3% | 76.9% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 11 | 15.2 | 7.6 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 47.2% | 35.0% | 80.0% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 73 | 14.3 | 5.6 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 42.3% | 37.2% | 84.8% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 59 | 13.9 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45.1% | 39.1% | 83.6% |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 6 | 8.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 41.3% | 26.9% | 75.0% |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 6 | 8.2 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 45.9% | 42.9% | 75.0% |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 6 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 55.6% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-1 |
| 0-1 |
| -4 |
| Thu, 4/9 | vs OKC | L 110-128 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -2 |
| Wed, 2/5 | vs LAL | L 97-122 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 | -19 |
Nicolas Batum earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 1196 games, Nicolas is contributing 4.0 points, 2.6 rebounds, and 0.9 assists per game in his role. Nicolas's best relative area is FG% at 39.9, though it still falls below the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.9 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Nicolas ranks 56th.
Nicolas Batum's public standing holds at a solid B sentiment grade — a genuinely impressive figure for a 37-year-old longtime veteran whose on-court contributions have diminished considerably. The narrative driving that goodwill is almost entirely character-based: recent coverage has leaned hard into his candid self-awareness, his credited role in a mid-season system reset that reportedly steadied the Clippers, and his willingness to engage authentically with the broader NBA conversation — including a notable exchange about Victor Wembanyama's shot-blocking ceiling. The disconnect between sentiment and production is stark and worth acknowledging honestly — a D+ performance grade across 66 games in the 2025-26 season, posting 4.0 points, 2.6 rebounds, and 0.9 assists per game, reflects replacement-level output by any meaningful measure, and the favorable perception exists almost entirely independent of those numbers. What's sustaining the goodwill is precisely the kind of intangible capital that doesn't show up in a box score: Batum has positioned himself as a trusted locker-room voice on a Clippers team navigating a difficult stretch, and reporting around a potential "Batum decision" suggests the organization itself views him as something more than roster filler. With Los Angeles sitting at 42-40 as the No. 9 seed in the West and the playoff window closing fast, the narrative around Batum is less about what he does and more about what he represents — a stabilizing presence in an uncertain moment. The bottom line is that his B sentiment grade is a testament to 18 seasons of credibility, but it exists on borrowed equity; if the Clippers' situation deteriorates further, that goodwill has a ceiling no locker-room reputation can raise.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.