
#34PF · Oklahoma City Thunder
Height
6'7"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
31
College
TCU
Experience
7 yrs
Wingspan
6'7.3"
Reach
8'7.5"
Hand Size
8.5" × 9.75"
Grade Kenrich Williams
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kenrich Williams grades out as a middling PF for Oklahoma City Thunder (C+ Impact). That places him 78th of 84 graded power forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is poor (F Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a significant overpay (F), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 438 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 49.4% | 36.9% | 56.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 48 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 48 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 49.4% | D- D- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 16 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 40.0% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 25.0% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 53 | 8.0 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 51.7% | C C |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 49 | 7.4 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 46.1% | D+ D+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 53.3% | D+ D+ |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 39 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 34.7% | D D |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 46 | 6.1 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 38.4% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 5/31 | vs SAS | L 103-111 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-2 | -1 |
| Fri, 5/29 | @ SAS | L 91-118 | 15 | 7 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$14.3M
Guaranteed
$14.3M
AAV
$7.2M/yr
The F Contract Value Index on Kenrich Williams' deal stems from how production lines up against the cap hit. At $7.163M AAV over two years, Williams is being paid as a complementary rotation piece, but his 2025-26 season numbers of 6.6 PPG, 3.2 RPG, and 1.4 APG across 48 games confirm that's exactly what he is—a depth contributor with modest offensive impact and limited scoring creation. For an established veteran at 31 entering his ninth season, this production-to-salary ratio is underwater; the contract presumes more offensive elasticity or defensive specialization than the on-court results justify. The disconnect between his media narrative—a reliable, high-energy culture-fit widely praised for clutch moments and locker-room value—and his actual CVI grade reveals a familiar trap: sentiment can mask underwhelming productivity in the salary cap ledger. With two years still remaining on the deal, Williams carries minimal flexibility upside; he's locked into a role as a playoff depth piece rather than a potential trade asset or starter-level contributor. For a title-contending Thunder team refining its roster ahead of a Finals push, his contract occupies cap space that could otherwise address more pressing positional scarcity, making this one of the harder swallows in OKC's compensation structure heading into June.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Kenrich's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kenrich Williams ranks 78th of 84 graded power forwards by performance. That slots Kenrich between Zeke Nnaji (F) just ahead and Quinten Post (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Zeke NnajiDenver NuggetsFGui SantosGolden State WarriorsFNae'Qwan TomlinCleveland CavaliersFGraded lower
Quinten PostGolden State WarriorsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kenrich Williams is a player in his 7th NBA season listed at PF for the Oklahoma City Thunder. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kenrich Williams, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance F, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 0.1 |
| 49.4% |
| 40.4% |
| 64.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 16 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 40.0% | 20.0% | 50.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 53 | 8.0 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 51.7% | 37.3% | 43.6% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 49 | 7.4 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 46.1% | 33.9% | 54.5% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 53.3% | 44.4% | 57.1% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 39 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 34.7% | 25.8% | 34.6% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 46 | 6.1 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 38.4% | 33.3% | 68.4% |
| 6 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 2-8 |
| 1-4 |
| -6 |
| Wed, 5/27 | vs SAS | W 127-114 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-3 | 2-2 | +7 |
| Mon, 5/25 | @ SAS | L 82-103 | 23 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-4 | -4 |
| Sat, 5/23 | @ SAS | W 123-108 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0 |
| Sun, 5/10 | @ LAL | W 131-108 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | -1 |
| Fri, 5/8 | vs LAL | W 125-107 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +1 |
Kenrich Williams earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 438 games, Kenrich is contributing 6.6 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Kenrich's strongest area is FG% at 49.4, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.4 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Kenrich ranks 78th.
Kenrich Williams sits at a C+ sentiment grade — quietly respected but not generating the kind of buzz you'd expect from a contributor on the NBA's top Western Conference seed heading into the playoffs. The narrative around him has cooled noticeably over the last 30 days, sliding down from what was a genuinely warm reception at the start of the season when coverage leaned heavily into his TCU roots and his championship journey resonating with local and national audiences alike. That feel-good momentum got its biggest boost from a standout performance in an improbable win over the Memphis Grizzlies, which briefly elevated him into the conversation as a clutch, high-energy role player — exactly the archetype OKC's system rewards. The disconnect, however, is hard to ignore: his on-court production this season grades out at a D-, and while his 2025-26 numbers of 6.6 PPG, 3.2 RPG, and 1.4 APG across 48 games tell the story of a depth piece rather than a rotation anchor, the media framing has consistently positioned him as more meaningful to the Thunder's competitive outlook than the raw production warrants. Recent roster churn — the team releasing Mason Plumlee, cycling through Buddy Boeheim twice, and adding Payton Sandfort — signals that OKC is actively fine-tuning its depth ahead of a deep playoff run, which puts Williams' role under subtle but real scrutiny even if no headline has explicitly said so. At 31 and eight seasons into his career, Williams is a recognized culture-fit veteran on a legitimate title contender, but with the sentiment trend cooling and production failing to justify the goodwill, the narrative around him feels more fragile than it did three months ago.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.