
#23SF · Los Angeles Lakers
Height
6'9"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
41
Experience
22 yrs
Wingspan
7'0.3"
Reach
8'10.3"
Grade LeBron James
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, LeBron James grades out as an excellent SF for Los Angeles Lakers (A Impact). That places him 4th of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is excellent (A+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 22+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1622 | 20.9 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 51.5% | 34.8% | 73.7% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 60 | 20.9 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 51.5% | 31.7% | 73.7% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 70 | 24.4 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 51.3% | 37.6% | 78.2% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 71 | 25.7 | 7.3 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 54.0% | 41.0% | 75.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 55 | 28.9 | 8.3 | 6.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 32.1% | 76.8% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 56 | 30.3 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 52.4% | 35.9% | 75.6% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 45 | 25.0 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 51.3% | 36.5% | 69.8% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 67 | 25.3 | 7.8 | 10.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 49.3% | 34.8% | 69.3% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 55 | 27.4 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 51.0% | 33.9% | 66.5% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 82 | 27.5 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 54.2% | 36.7% | 73.1% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 74 | 26.4 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 54.8% | 36.3% | 67.4% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 76 | 25.3 | 7.4 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 52.0% | 30.9% | 73.1% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 69 | 25.3 | 6.0 | 7.4 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 48.8% | 35.4% | 71.0% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 77 | 27.1 | 6.9 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 56.7% | 37.9% | 75.0% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 76 | 26.8 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 56.5% | 40.6% | 75.3% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 62 | 27.1 | 7.9 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 53.1% | 36.2% | 77.1% |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 79 | 26.7 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 51.0% | 33.0% | 75.9% |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 76 | 29.7 | 7.3 | 8.6 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 50.3% | 33.3% | 76.7% |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 81 | 28.4 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 48.9% | 34.4% | 78.0% |
| 2007-08 | ![]() | 75 | 30.0 | 7.9 | 7.2 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 48.4% | 31.5% | 71.2% |
| 2006-07 | ![]() | 78 | 27.3 | 6.7 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 47.6% | 31.9% | 69.8% |
| 2005-06 | ![]() | 79 | 31.4 | 7.0 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 48.0% | 33.5% | 73.8% |
| 2004-05 | ![]() | 80 | 27.2 | 7.3 | 7.2 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 47.2% | 35.1% | 75.0% |
| 2003-04 | ![]() | 79 | 20.9 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 41.7% | 29.0% | 75.4% |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 60 | 20.9 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 51.5% | A A |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 70 | 24.4 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 51.3% | A A |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 71 | 25.7 | 7.3 | 8.3 | 54.0% | A+ A+ |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 55 | 28.9 | 8.3 | 6.8 | 50.0% | A A |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 56 | 30.3 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 52.4% | A+ A+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 45 | 25.0 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 51.3% | A A |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 67 | 25.3 | 7.8 | 10.2 | 49.3% | A+ A+ |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 55 | 27.4 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 51.0% | A+ A+ |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 82 | 27.5 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 54.2% | A+ A+ |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 74 | 26.4 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 54.8% | A+ A+ |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 76 | 25.3 | 7.4 | 6.8 | 52.0% | A+ A+ |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 69 | 25.3 | 6.0 | 7.4 | 48.8% | A+ A+ |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 77 | 27.1 | 6.9 | 6.4 | 56.7% | A A |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 76 | 26.8 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 56.5% | A+ A+ |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 62 | 27.1 | 7.9 | 6.2 | 53.1% | A+ A+ |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 79 | 26.7 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 51.0% | A+ A+ |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 76 | 29.7 | 7.3 | 8.6 | 50.3% | A+ A+ |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 81 | 28.4 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 48.9% | A+ A+ |
| 2007-08 | ![]() | 75 | 30.0 | 7.9 | 7.2 | 48.4% | A+ A+ |
| 2006-07 | ![]() | 78 | 27.3 | 6.7 | 6.0 | 47.6% | A+ A+ |
| 2005-06 | ![]() | 79 | 31.4 | 7.0 | 6.6 | 48.0% | A+ A+ |
| 2004-05 | ![]() | 80 | 27.2 | 7.3 | 7.2 | 47.2% | A+ A+ |
| 2003-04 | ![]() | 79 | 20.9 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 41.7% | B+ B+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 5/12 | vs OKC | L 110-115 | 40 | 24 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8-18 | 2-6 | -17 |
| Sun, 5/10 | vs OKC | L 108-131 | 37 | 19 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7-19 | 2-6 | -24 |
| Fri, 5/8 | @ OKC | L 107-125 | 38 | 23 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9-18 | 1-4 | -9 |
| Wed, 5/6 | @ OKC | L 90-108 | 36 | 27 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 12-17 | 3-6 | -6 |
| Sat, 5/2 | @ HOU | W 98-78 | 37 | 28 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 10-25 | 2-5 | +26 |
| Thu, 4/30 | vs HOU | L 93-99 | 39 | 25 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 9-20 | 0-6 | -5 |
| Mon, 4/27 | @ HOU | L 96-115 | 33 | 10 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2-9 | 0-3 | -18 |
| Sat, 4/25 | @ HOU | W 112-108 | 45 | 29 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 10-22 | 4-9 | 0 |
| Wed, 4/22 | vs HOU | W 101-94 | 39 | 28 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 8-20 | 2-5 | +6 |
| Sun, 4/19 | vs HOU | W 107-98 | 38 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 9-15 | 1-2 | +11 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$52.6M
Guaranteed
$52.6M
AAV
$52.6M/yr
Among SF contracts at this AAV tier, LeBron James earns a C+ Contract Value Index (CVI). At 41 years old in his 23rd season, James delivered a 2025-26 campaign of 20.9 PPG, 6.1 RPG, and 7.2 APG across 60 games—production that justifies his A+ performance grade and reinforces his status as a transcendent on-court force—yet his $52.6M AAV on a one-year deal reflects the structural tension between his individual excellence and the organizational uncertainty now surrounding his immediate future. The CVI grade reflects a collision between elite talent and genuine question marks about roster construction: James himself has publicly acknowledged that Oklahoma City "out-talented" the Lakers in the playoffs, a candid admission that undercuts the value proposition of paying a franchise-altering salary for a player on a squad the media has begun framing as potentially needing to chart a post-LeBron direction. At the longtime veteran stage, James commands max-tier compensation that remains defensible on talent grounds, yet the delayed free-agency timeline stretching into August and recent roster moves—re-signing Nick Smith Jr. while waiving Kobe Bufkin—read more like damage control than championship reinforcement, compounding the sense that the organization's faith in its ability to contend around him may be wavering. The one-year structure offers the Lakers flexibility heading into the offseason, but it also codifies the fundamental mismatch: elite individual production on a max contract without the surrounding roster depth needed to credibly challenge at the Finals level. James's unimpeachable legacy and continued on-court excellence prevent this grade from falling further, but the cloud of uncertainty surrounding both his basketball future and the franchise's commitment to competitive construction keeps the CVI verdict solidly in middling territory.
LeBron James is playing at an elite level this season, earning an A+ Performance grade. Among NBA small forwards, he's producing at an All-Star or All-NBA caliber. He's averaging 20.9 points, 6.1 rebounds, and 7.2 assists through 1622 games — carrying a significant offensive load. LeBron's strongest area is APG at 7.2, which compares favorably to the small forward median of 4.0. The biggest area for growth is FG% at 51.5 (small forward median: 46.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, LeBron ranks 4th. LeBron is a cornerstone of the Los Angeles Lakers' roster and is performing at a level that warrants his place among the league's best.
Recent headlines push LeBron James's sentiment grade to an A-, with the Los Angeles Lakers' broader season shaping the read. At 41 years old in his 23rd season, James remains historically decorated—four MVPs, four Finals MVPs, and All-NBA selections spanning two decades—yet the narrative has fundamentally shifted away from celebrating on-court excellence toward wrestling with structural uncertainty that is rare and unprecedented for a player of his stature. His 2025-26 production of 20.9 PPG, 6.1 RPG, and 7.2 APG across 60 games fully aligns with an A+ performance grade, yet media observers have zeroed in on the mismatch between his individual excellence and a Lakers roster that appears talent-deficient relative to playoff contenders—a dynamic James himself reinforced by admitting Oklahoma City "out-talented" the team in the playoffs. The delayed announcement of his free-agency decision stretching into August, combined with rare speculation that the Lakers may be forced to chart a post-LeBron direction, has introduced a power-dynamic tension that suppresses enthusiasm even among reverent analysts; organizational moves like the re-signing of Nick Smith Jr. and waiver of Kobe Bufkin read more like roster damage control than championship reinforcement. The defining tension of this moment remains the gap between his unimpeachable on-court excellence and the cloud of uncertainty surrounding his immediate basketball future, keeping sentiment solid but cooling rather than celebratory as the basketball world awaits his August decision on whether to continue his career.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where LeBron's contract sits relative to comparable money.
LeBron James ranks 4th of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots LeBron between Kawhi Leonard (A+) just ahead and Deni Avdija (A+) just behind.
Graded higher
Kawhi LeonardLos Angeles ClippersA+Kevin DurantHouston RocketsA+Jalen JohnsonAtlanta HawksA+Graded lower
Deni AvdijaPortland Trail BlazersA+Trey Murphy IIINew Orleans PelicansA+Jaylen BrownBoston CelticsAPeers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
LeBron James is a veteran in his 22nd NBA season listed at SF for the Los Angeles Lakers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on LeBron James, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance A+, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.