
#31SF · Dallas Mavericks
Height
6'5"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
36
College
Washington State
Experience
14 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.0"
Reach
8'7.5"
Hand Size
8.75" × 9.25"
Grade Klay Thompson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Klay Thompson grades out as a shaky SF for Dallas Mavericks (D- Impact). That places him 89th of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a significant overpay (F), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 14+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 926 | 11.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 39.8% | 40.9% | 85.7% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 62 | 11.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 62 | 11.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 39.8% | D+ D+ |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 72 | 14.0 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 41.2% | C+ C+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 77 | 17.9 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 43.2% | B- B- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 13 | 18.5 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 38.8% | C+ C+ |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 22 | 19.0 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 42.9% | B B |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 21 | 20.7 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 45.6% | B+ B+ |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 21 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 46.5% | B- B- |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 17 | 15.0 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 39.7% | B- B- |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 24 | 24.3 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 44.4% | B+ B+ |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 21 | 18.6 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 44.6% | B+ B+ |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 7 | 16.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 40.8% | B- B- |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 12 | 15.2 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 43.7% | B- B- |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 66 | 12.5 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 44.3% | C+ C+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | vs CHI | W 149-128 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-10 | 4-9 | -4 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ LAC | L 103-116 | 26 | 11 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$34.1M
Guaranteed
$34.1M
AAV
$16.7M/yr
Production versus salary tier earns Klay Thompson a F Contract Value Index in the NBA market. At $16.7M AAV across two years, Thompson's contract sits well above replacement-level compensation, yet his 2025-26 season output of 11.9 PPG, 2.2 RPG, and 1.4 APG across 62 games paints the picture of a below-average contributor — a stark disconnect between what Dallas committed and what it received on the floor. For a 36-year-old veteran in his 13th NBA season, regression is expected, but the magnitude here is severe enough that the CVI cannot justify his salary tier even accounting for his four-time championship pedigree and All-Defensive/All-NBA accolades from the mid-2010s. The Mavericks' 26-56 collapse offers no offsetting context; Thompson was meant to be a closing piece for contention, not a depth experiment on an imploding roster. Media framing has already shifted toward a potential exit, with headlines suggesting the organization is exploring trades that would grant Thompson his apparent wish to depart — a telling sign that Dallas views the remaining year-plus of this deal as a liability rather than an asset. With the Finals days away and Dallas watching from home, the calculus is plain: this contract has underperformed its market value, and the organization appears ready to absorb the cost of moving on.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Klay's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Klay Thompson ranks 89th of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Klay between Amari Williams (D) just ahead and Leonard Miller (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Amari WilliamsBoston CelticsDTosan EvbuomwanCharlotte HornetsDTaurean PrinceMilwaukee BucksDGraded lower
Leonard MillerChicago BullsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Klay Thompson is a veteran in his 14th NBA season listed at SF for the Dallas Mavericks. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Klay Thompson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance D, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.5 |
| 0.3 |
| 39.8% |
| 38.9% |
| 73.8% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 72 | 14.0 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 41.2% | 39.1% | 90.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 77 | 17.9 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 43.2% | 38.7% | 92.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 13 | 18.5 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 38.8% | 36.8% | 87.5% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 22 | 19.0 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 42.9% | 38.5% | 86.7% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 21 | 20.7 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 45.6% | 44.3% | 90.2% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 21 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 46.5% | 42.7% | 87.1% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 17 | 15.0 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 39.7% | 38.7% | 78.8% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 24 | 24.3 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 44.4% | 42.4% | 85.4% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 21 | 18.6 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 44.6% | 39.0% | 80.0% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 7 | 16.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 40.8% | 36.4% | 79.2% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 12 | 15.2 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 43.7% | 42.4% | 83.3% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 66 | 12.5 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 44.3% | 41.4% | 86.8% |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 3 |
| 4-17 |
| 1-10 |
| +1 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs ORL | L 127-138 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7-13 | 4-10 | -11 |
Klay Thompson earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA small forwards this season. Through 926 games, Klay is contributing 11.9 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Klay's best relative area is FG% at 39.8, though it still falls below the small forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.4 (small forward median: 4.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Klay ranks 89th.
How the public sees Klay Thompson shakes out to a B- sentiment grade in the rolling 14-day window. The narrative reflects a star caught between his Hall-of-Fame legacy and the harsh reality of his current contribution—a four-time champion and 13-season veteran whose presence in Dallas was supposed to anchor a contention window, but instead became a symbol of the Mavericks' catastrophic 56-loss collapse. His 2025-26 production of 11.9 PPG, 2.2 RPG, and 1.4 APG across 62 games paints the picture of a below-average contributor, a gap that media coverage has seized on relentlessly, framing Thompson less as a victim of circumstance and more as a player whose elite ceiling has dimmed irretrievably. The outbound trade speculation—headlines about his apparent openness to departing and recent coverage framing a potential move as fulfilling his own wishes rather than a mutual organizational decision—has only deepened skepticism about his fit and commitment, yet the accumulated goodwill from his All-Defensive honor in 2019 and back-to-back All-NBA selections in 2015 and 2016 have prevented full collapse in public perception. What's keeping sentiment from cratering entirely is genuine fan affection for a 13-season veteran and acknowledgment that his elite shooting remains capable of flashing; the narrative today is fundamentally one of decline—still commanding respect for what he accomplished, but increasingly scrutinized about whether he can recapture relevance on a winning team heading into what figures to be a consequential offseason.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.