
#7SF · Sacramento Kings
Height
6'7"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
34
College
Creighton
Experience
11 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.3"
Reach
8'7.0"
Hand Size
8.75" × 9.75"
Grade Doug McDermott
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Doug McDermott grades out as a shaky SF for Sacramento Kings (D- Impact). That places him 91st of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 716 | 5.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 41.8% | 41.0% | 80.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 21 | 5.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 21 | 5.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 41.8% | F F |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 42 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 42.7% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 10 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 45.5% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 64 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 45.7% | D- D- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 51 | 11.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 46.2% | D- D- |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 13.6 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 53.2% | C- C- |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 4 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 26.7% | F F |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 20.0% | F F |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 81 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 46.7% | D- D- |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 5 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 50.0% | F F |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 81 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 45.2% | D- D- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ POR | L 110-122 | 26 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs GSW | W 124-118 | 14 | 3 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Doug McDermott's $2.3M deal lands at a C- Contract Value Index, signaling how Sacramento weighed the NBA cap math on a veteran role player whose on-court output has not justified even modest roster investment. Through 21 games in the 2025-26 season, McDermott has posted 5.3 PPG, 1.1 RPG, and 0.6 APG—production that sits well below specialist standards and aligns cleanly with his D performance grade. At 34 and in his 12th season, McDermott slots into the established-veteran tier as a depth-piece bet: the Kings clearly valued floor spacing and off-ball reliability over two-way impact, a credible if uninspiring use of cap room on a one-year deal. The C- CVI reflects the disconnect between what Sacramento paid and what McDermott delivered—a non-premium contract for a non-premium contributor, but one that carries genuine roster drag when a team is 22-60 and mathematically eliminated from playoff contention. Sacramento's recent pattern of low-profile signings—Killian Hayes, DaQuan Jeffries—underscores an organization in evaluation mode rather than competing for wins, which makes even a $2.3M commitment feel like a resource that could have been better deployed. With only one year on the deal, the downside is capped and reversible, but the CVI grade reflects a misalignment between contract premium and demonstrable value that Sacramento has not been able to overcome.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Doug's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Doug McDermott ranks 91st of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Doug between Taurean Prince (D) just ahead and Caleb Martin (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Taurean PrinceMilwaukee BucksDKlay ThompsonDallas MavericksDLeonard MillerChicago BullsDGraded lower
Caleb MartinDallas MavericksNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Doug McDermott is a veteran in his 11th NBA season listed at SF for the Sacramento Kings. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Doug McDermott, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 |
| 41.8% |
| 39.8% |
| 100.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 42 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 42.7% | 43.6% | 60.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 10 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 45.5% | 37.5% | 0.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 64 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 45.7% | 41.3% | 75.7% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 51 | 11.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 46.2% | 42.2% | 78.4% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 13.6 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 53.2% | 38.8% | 81.6% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 4 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 26.7% | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 20.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 81 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 46.7% | 42.6% | 79.0% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 5 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 50.0% | 53.8% | 0.0% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 81 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 45.2% | 42.5% | 85.7% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-5 |
| 0-3 |
| -10 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ GSW | L 105-110 | 29 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5-13 | 4-10 | -4 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs NOP | W 117-113 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-5 | -1 |
Doug McDermott earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA small forwards this season. Through 716 games, Doug is contributing 5.3 points, 1.1 rebounds, and 0.6 assists per game in his role. Doug's best relative area is FG% at 41.8, though it still falls below the small forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.6 (small forward median: 4.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Doug ranks 91st.
Public perception of Doug McDermott sits at a C- sentiment grade, with the Sacramento Kings conversation tracking his role-player reliability rather than star impact. The media framing around him is straightforward and unremarkable—a 34-year-old veteran specialist re-signed on a modest $3.6M deal, valued primarily for floor spacing and off-ball movement, with no illusions about his ceiling or two-way impact. That characterization is actually more generous than his on-court output warrants: across the 2025-26 season, McDermott has posted 5.3 PPG in 21 games, below-average production even by specialist standards and a direct match to his D performance grade. The broader Sacramento context is actively working against any positive narrative momentum—a franchise sitting at 22-60 and eliminated from playoff contention, quietly cycling through low-profile signings like Killian Hayes and DaQuan Jeffries, naturally dims the spotlight on every roster piece. The Kings' tanking investigation, while ultimately resolved without punishment, cast a shadow over the entire organization that inevitably colored perception of players like McDermott, though that episode has now faded from immediate focus. At this stage with Sacramento mathematically eliminated, McDermott's narrative is essentially frozen—a competent veteran presence coasting toward season's end with no obvious mechanism to shift either the fan or media conversation in any direction.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.