
#00C · Milwaukee Bucks
Height
6'10"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
27
College
Texas
Experience
4 yrs
Wingspan
7'3.3"
Reach
8'10.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9.75"
Grade Jericho Sims
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jericho Sims grades out as a shaky C for Milwaukee Bucks (D+ Impact). That places him 94th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D-, a slight overpay. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 258 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 78.4% | 0.0% | 60.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 67 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.6 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 67 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 78.4% | F F |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 53 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 63.4% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 45 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 69.1% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 52 | 3.4 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 77.6% | F F |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 41 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 72.2% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | @ PHI | L 106-126 | 31 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7-9 | 0-0 | -19 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs BKN | W 125-108 | 30 | 11 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$5.3M
Guaranteed
$2.5M
AAV
$2.5M/yr
Jericho Sims delivered enough rotation-tier impact to earn a D- Contract Value Index against the NBA pay band. At $2.5M AAV on a two-year deal, Sims is absorbing minimal cap risk, but the D- grade reflects a fundamental mismatch: his performance metrics—5.0 PPG, 5.5 RPG, and 1.6 APG across 67 games in the 2025-26 season—paint the picture of a depth-piece center, not a player justifying rotation consistency in a franchise's long-term architecture. The contract itself carries no luxury-tax burden and provides flexibility, which is the only reason this deal doesn't crater further, but Sims' F performance grade exposes the ceiling on what Milwaukee can realistically expect from a developmental five-year veteran at 27 years old. Media framing has orbited around quiet competence and "undervalued asset" narratives—including the novelty of his first career triple-double and elite field-goal efficiency—yet that optimism sits in uncomfortable tension with a struggling 32-50 team and tepid fan sentiment that reads as ambivalent rather than convinced. The CVI penalty is severe because the Bucks are gambling that modest rim-finishing ability and rebounding floor cover a player who hasn't developed into a reliable starter or playmaker; on a contending roster with playoff stakes weeks away, that gamble looks less like shrewd front-office opportunism and more like hope filling a gaping hole. For a 5-year veteran, this is the contract floor—cheap, short, and quietly expendable if the 2026 offseason demands roster reset.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Jericho's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jericho Sims ranks 94th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Jericho between Moritz Wagner (F) just ahead and Nick Richards (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Moritz WagnerOrlando MagicFJock LandaleAtlanta HawksFDrew EubanksSacramento KingsFGraded lower
Nick RichardsChicago BullsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jericho Sims is a player in his 4th NBA season listed at C for the Milwaukee Bucks. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jericho Sims, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D-, Performance F, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.3 |
| 0.3 |
| 78.4% |
| 0.0% |
| 62.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 53 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 63.4% | 0.0% | 61.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 45 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 69.1% | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 52 | 3.4 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 77.6% | 0.0% | 75.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 41 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 72.2% | 0.0% | 41.4% |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 4-4 |
| 0-0 |
| -7 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ DET | L 111-137 | 39 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-0 | -20 |
| Tue, 4/7 | @ BKN | L 90-96 | 37 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-0 | +7 |
| Sun, 4/5 | vs MEM | W 131-115 | 26 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6-7 | 0-0 | +19 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs BOS | L 101-133 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | +3 |
Jericho Sims earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 258 games, Jericho is contributing 5.0 points, 5.5 rebounds, and 1.6 assists per game in his role. Jericho's strongest area is FG% at 78.4, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 5.0 (center median: 15.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Jericho ranks 94th.
The talk around Jericho Sims this stretch nets a C+ sentiment grade. Media framing around the Milwaukee center has struck an interesting tone — several prominent outlets have positioned him as a quietly breaking-out player and credited the Bucks' front office for recognizing an undervalued asset, with his first career triple-double against the Pistons generating genuine buzz and reinforcing a narrative of expanded offensive upside beyond traditional rim-running. That cautiously optimistic storyline runs headlong into a blunt reality: his 2025-26 season statistics of 5.0 PPG, 5.5 RPG, and 1.6 APG across 67 games describe a serviceable backup center, and his F-rated performance grade reflects that whatever upside observers are projecting hasn't translated into sustained on-court impact for a team sitting 32-50 and well outside playoff contention. Recent roster churn — the Bucks' mid-stretch releases and rest-of-season signings, including forward Pete Nance — only amplifies the instability framing around Milwaukee's direction, and comparative fan polling between Sims and other center options suggests the fanbase itself remains unconvinced he's the long-term answer. The bottom line is a fractured narrative: niche media observers are building a case around Sims' rim-finishing efficiency and rebounding value, but the broader conversation treats him as depth filler on a crumbling roster, and most end-of-season reviews read more like organizational necessity than endorsement of genuine breakout momentum.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.