
#19C · Sacramento Kings
Height
6'10"
Weight
245 lbs
Age
29
College
Oregon State
Experience
7 yrs
Grade Drew Eubanks
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Drew Eubanks grades out as a shaky C for Sacramento Kings (D- Impact). That places him 93rd of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D-, a slight overpay. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 426 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 59.6% | 36.7% | 71.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 42 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.5 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 42 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 59.6% | F F |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 61 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 59.3% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 75 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 60.1% | D- D- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 78 | 6.6 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 64.1% | C C |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 71 | 7.7 | 5.4 | 1.2 | 59.6% | D+ D+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 54 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 56.6% | D D |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 22 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 64.2% | D D |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 23 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 57.7% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Drew Eubanks' Contract Value Index lands at D-, putting the deal in a clear band of comparable signings. At $2.3 million annually on a one-year deal, Eubanks occupies the salary floor of NBA roster construction—a zone where even modest performance disruptions create material value problems. His 2025-26 season stats of 5.2 PPG and 3.0 RPG across 42 games underscore the core issue: a season-ending thumb surgery derailed what had been a steady, if unspectacular, reserve role, and his F performance grade reflects the harsh reality that seven-year veterans operating at minimum-level contracts cannot afford extended absences without destroying their positional value. The mediaFraming is unambiguous—Eubanks entered camp with a reputation as a high-efficiency rim protector, but injury bulletins have crowded out any goodwill, and Sacramento's recent signings of guard depth suggest the organization is actively rotating personnel without him. At 29 and in the established veteran phase of his career, Eubanks lacks the upside narrative or cost-control structure that justify mid-tier spending; he was always a role-specific value play, and health uncertainty at his salary tier converts that into a drag. The one-year structure is irrelevant mitigation—there is no contractual escape hatch when the player himself is unavailable, and his competition for minutes at training camp will determine whether this deal ever generates positive value.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Drew's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Drew Eubanks ranks 93rd of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Drew between Jay Huff (D-) just ahead and Jericho Sims (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Jay HuffIndiana PacersD-Moritz WagnerOrlando MagicFJock LandaleAtlanta HawksFGraded lower
Jericho SimsMilwaukee BucksFNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Drew Eubanks is a player in his 7th NBA season listed at C for the Sacramento Kings. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Drew Eubanks, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D-, Performance F, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.4 |
| 0.6 |
| 59.6% |
| 14.3% |
| 56.1% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 61 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 59.3% | 50.0% | 66.2% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 75 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 60.1% | 100.0% | 77.4% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 78 | 6.6 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 64.1% | 38.9% | 66.4% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 71 | 7.7 | 5.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 59.6% | 21.7% | 76.2% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 54 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 56.6% | 100.0% | 72.6% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 22 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 64.2% | 100.0% | 76.9% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 23 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 57.7% | 0.0% | 84.6% |
Drew Eubanks earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 426 games, Drew is contributing 5.2 points, 3.0 rebounds, and 0.5 assists per game in his role. Drew's strongest area is FG% at 59.6, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.5 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Drew ranks 93rd.
Drew Eubanks' public perception scores a D sentiment grade as NBA media and fan tone converge. The narrative around the 29-year-old center has shifted from appreciation of his reliable backup role—where he'd built a reputation as a high-efficiency rim protector averaging north of 60 percent from the field—to sustained concern about his season-ending thumb surgery and the durability questions it raises heading into camp. Media coverage remains sympathetic in framing but has been dominated by injury bulletins rather than performance praise; recent headlines have pivoted from celebrating his "thankless backup center role" to tracking his medical timeline and the opportunity his absence created for a rookie to establish himself in Sacramento's rotation. The gap between his established identity as a solid contributor and his current F performance grade reflects the harsh reality that a seven-year veteran operating at $2.3M annually has no room for extended absences—the Kings' recent signings of guards (DaQuan Jeffries in late March, Killian Hayes earlier that month) suggest the organization is actively reshaping depth without waiting for his return, which undercuts his perceived indispensability. The overall perception has settled into mixed-to-cautious territory: valued for what he's shown in the past, but facing legitimate competition for minutes and operating under a cloud of availability uncertainty that no amount of goodwill can fully dispel.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.