
#56 RP · Phillies
Height
6'4"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
29
College
Kentucky
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Zach Pop
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Zach Pop grades out as a poor RP for Phillies (F Performance). That places him 370th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 170 | 4.827112 | 8-6 | 132 | 1.3497052 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 7 | 3.68 | 0-0 | 6 | 1.09 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$900K
Guaranteed
$540K
AAV
$900K/yr
Plate appearances and per-game impact line up to a F performance grade for Zach Pop. The 2026 season has been a washout for the 29-year-old righty, who has managed just six strikeouts across seven games with zero wins — a production profile that places him squarely at the back of the depth chart rather than in any meaningful bullpen role. His single noteworthy metric is that he's appeared in enough games to at least take the field, but the lack of any measurable productivity makes durability irrelevant when there's nothing positive to show for the opportunity. Pop's current assignment — a rehab stint following recent injury — underscores the larger problem: he's been reliable enough to earn trust in an emergency spot-start scenario (replacing Andrew Painter), but that organizational confidence hasn't translated to actual performance, and health uncertainty now clouds whatever future role he might claim. As a six-year veteran entering a roster competition, Pop was brought in to compete for a back-of-bullpen spot on a $0.9M deal, a modest investment that reflects both the Phillies' modest expectations and the brutal reality that mid-career depth arms rarely resurface as viable contributors. The Phillies' aggressive bullpen cycling — adding multiple arms in a compressed window — makes it clear the organization views Pop as one option among many rather than a foundational piece, and with Philadelphia fighting for playoff positioning at 37-31, he'll need to deliver something tangible upon his return to justify keeping a roster spot.
Zach Pop ranks 370th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Zach between Burch Smith (F) just ahead and Connor Seabold (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Burch SmithTigersFYunior MarteRedsFCody BoltonAstrosFGraded lower
Connor SeaboldRoyalsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Zach Pop is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at RP for the Phillies. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Zach Pop, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance F, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 4 |
| 13.50 |
| 0-0 |
| 3 |
| 2.25 |
| 5.1 |
| 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 1 | 20.25 | 0-1 | — | 3.75 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2025 | 5 | 14.85 | 0-1 | 3 | 2.55 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 58 | 5.59 | 2-4 | 33 | 1.32 | 48.1 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 | 6.59 | 1-1 | 14 | 1.24 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 18 | 3.60 | 2-0 | 14 | 1.25 | 20.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 1.89 | 2-0 | 11 | 1.05 | 19.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 35 | 2.77 | 4-0 | 25 | 1.15 | 39.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 50 | 4.12 | 1-0 | 51 | 1.43 | 54.2 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.