
#37 C · Twins
Height
6'0"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
32
College
Miami-Dade CC FL
Draft
2013, Rd 2, #65
Experience
9 yrs
Bats/Throws
B/R
Grade Victor Caratini
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Victor Caratini grades out as a poor C for Twins (F Performance). That places him 79th of 92 graded catchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at F, a significant overpay. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 46 | .207 | 3 | 22 | .589 | 0 | 30 |
| 2025 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$14.0M
Guaranteed
$8.4M
AAV
$7.0M/yr
Victor Caratini's Contract Value Index lands at F, placing the deal in a defined slice of comparable MLB signings. At $7M AAV over two years, this agreement represents a significant overpay for a 32-year-old backup catcher whose on-field performance does not justify veteran-scale compensation—the F performance grade tells you the underlying production has not materialized even to the modest standards implied by a platoon role. Caratini is operating as an established veteran in the twilight of his career, and while his nine years of big-league experience provide organizational familiarity and credibility, that seniority does not offset the salary premium attached to this deal. The Twins' recent activity—particularly the signing of catcher Ryan Jeffers just days before Caratini came aboard, along with a sustained wave of pitching acquisitions and roster churn—suggests the organization is prioritizing roster depth and evaluation over long-term catching investment, which further erodes the strategic case for locking $7M annually into a backup option. Media framing has remained neutral-to-slightly-positive on optics alone, with the front office signaling intentional roster planning, but at least one outlet has flagged the signing as a failure in strategic discretion—a subtle but pointed critique that reflects skepticism about whether this deal accomplishes anything beyond plugging a temporary hole. With a two-year commitment in place and the regular season still four months from conclusion, the Twins are already well into a roster-depth conversation that leaves Caratini operating on the organizational periphery, unlikely to generate either enthusiasm or serious backlash unless performance deteriorates further or the team's trajectory forces a reckoning with spending allocation.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Victor's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Victor Caratini ranks 79th of 92 graded catchers by performance. That slots Victor between Hayden Senger (D) just ahead and Chuckie Robinson (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Hayden SengerMetsDSebastian RiveroAngelsDBo NaylorGuardiansFGraded lower
Chuckie RobinsonDodgers| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, 6/11 | @ DET | L 0-11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ DET | L 4-10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Victor Caratini is a veteran in his 9th MLB season listed at C for the Twins. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Victor Caratini, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance F, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.

| 114 |
| .259 |
| 12 |
| 46 |
| .728 |
| 1 |
| 89 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 87 | .269 | 8 | 30 | .744 | 0 | 66 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 62 | .259 | 7 | 25 | .710 | 1 | 52 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 96 | .199 | 9 | 34 | .642 | 0 | 54 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 116 | .227 | 7 | 39 | .632 | 2 | 71 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 44 | .241 | 1 | 16 | .661 | 0 | 28 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 95 | .266 | 11 | 34 | .795 | 1 | 65 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 76 | .232 | 2 | 21 | .597 | 0 | 42 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 31 | .254 | 1 | 2 | .689 | 0 | 15 |
Victor Caratini produces at a tier that grades an F performance mark for the Twins. Through 46 games in the 2026 season, his offensive profile has cratered—a .207 batting average and 35 strikeouts against just 3 home runs represent a catastrophic collapse that leaves no room for interpretation as a small-sample variance issue. The only quantifiable bright spot in his statistical sheet is the modest home run total itself, which at least suggests occasional hard contact in an otherwise barren offensive landscape. He's seeing regular work at the position (46 games is a substantial workload for a backup catcher), yet the on-field production has betrayed even the modest utility expectations that surrounded his two-year, $7M AAV signing—a deal premised on pitch-framing expertise and veteran stability rather than offensive contribution. The mediaFraming correctly identified him as a "dependable veteran backstop" valued for intangibles, but that narrative provided no hedge against the possibility that his bat would deteriorate this sharply at 32 years old. With the Twins mired at 31-39 and frantically adding pitching depth via recent trades and signings, Caratini's invisibility in the offensive column has become indefensible, and his role appears destined to shrink unless the production reverses dramatically in the stretch run.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sun, 6/7 | vs KC | L 5-6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs KC | L 2-3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs KC | L 6-8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs CHW | L 0-8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |