
#12 C · Red Sox
Height
5'10"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
30
College
N/A
Draft
2017, Rd 3, #100
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Connor Wong
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Connor Wong grades out as a poor C for Red Sox (F Performance). That places him 82nd of 92 graded catchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at F, a significant overpay. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 372 | 0.24618149 | 23 | 113 | 0.6824572 | 19 | 274 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 25 | .261 | 0 | 10 | .715 | 1 | 18 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.4M
Guaranteed
$825K
AAV
$1.4M/yr
Earning a F Contract Value Index, Connor Wong's 1-year pact reflects Boston's read on the free-agent market. At $1.375M AAV, this deal lands firmly in replacement-level territory for a 30-year-old catcher, and it's a grade that's entirely justified by Wong's performance output—an F across the board—which means the contract is priced for depth, not production. The Red Sox are essentially betting on organizational familiarity and continuity at the position rather than genuine upside; at this salary, they're not overpaying for a proven commodity, but they're also not signaling confidence in someone poised for a breakout. What makes this valuation particularly telling is the mismatch between Wong's actual on-field production and his current media narrative—the sentiment around him sits at a B-, riding a wave of goodwill tied to the benching of a veteran competitor and a couple of clutch moments, but that goodwill is running well ahead of the underlying performance data, a precarious position that can evaporate quickly as the season grinds on. The one-year structure at least limits Boston's exposure; there's no multi-year commitment anchoring the books, and the front office's recent flurry of roster moves—pickups at multiple positions and signings across the pitching staff—suggests they're in active evaluation mode rather than locked into a long-term vision. Wong's contract value is exactly what it should be for a depth catcher on a struggling roster, but if the sentiment-to-performance gap doesn't narrow, this deal will look worse as the months pass.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Connor's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Connor Wong ranks 82nd of 92 graded catchers by performance. That slots Connor between Victor Caratini (F) just ahead and Keibert Ruiz (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Victor CaratiniTwinsFChuckie RobinsonDodgersFAramis GarciaDiamondbacksFGraded lower
Keibert RuizNationals| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | vs TOR | L 1-6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ NYY | W 5-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Connor Wong is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at C for the Red Sox. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Connor Wong, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance F, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 63 |
| .190 |
| 0 |
| 7 |
| .500 |
| 2 |
| 32 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 126 | .280 | 13 | 52 | .758 | 8 | 125 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 126 | .235 | 9 | 36 | .673 | 8 | 87 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 27 | .188 | 1 | 7 | .586 | 0 | 9 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 6 | .308 | 0 | 1 | .895 | 0 | 4 |
Stacked against the C field, Connor Wong grades out at a F performance level for the Red Sox. A 30-year-old fifth-year veteran, Wong is delivering replacement-level production at a position where the Red Sox desperately needed stability, yet the organizational narrative—bolstered by a $1.375M AAV deal and the benching of Carlos Narváez—has outpaced his actual on-field contribution by a considerable margin. The sentiment around Wong sits at a B-, driven largely by clutch moments like a two-run double and the framing of an internal catcher competition he's "winning," but that positive momentum is dangerously unmoored from the performance data, which paints a bleak picture. With the Red Sox floundering at 22-27 and 128 days remaining in the regular season, Wong's role as the primary backstop carries real consequences—every at-bat matters in a stretched lineup, and a catcher grading out as below-average cannot afford to rely on narrative goodwill to carry his job security. The risk here is straightforward: as Boston's roster churn continues and scrutiny intensifies on every contributor, Wong's performance grade will eventually collide with his inflated sentiment, and that collision will be brutal for a player whose standing is built on recent headlines rather than sustained production. Unless the underlying numbers improve materially, this B- sentiment grade has significantly more downside than upside from this point forward.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/4 | vs BAL | L 2-8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |