
#45 RP · Diamondbacks
Height
6'3"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
33
College
Charleston
Draft
2015, Rd 3, #76
Experience
6 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Taylor Clarke
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Taylor Clarke grades out as a middling RP for Diamondbacks (C Performance). That places him 270th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C-, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 257 | 4.5715623 | 17-17 | 313 | 1.2740879 | 0.0 | 8 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 28 | 1.73 | 2-1 | 13 | 0.73 | 26.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.6M
Guaranteed
$930K
AAV
$1.6M/yr
Taylor Clarke's on-field production earns a C performance grade against RP peers across MLB. The 33-year-old right-hander has logged 28 games in the 2026 season with a 2-3 record and 13 strikeouts, representing the kind of limited-leverage, depth-piece production you'd expect from a veteran arm in a competitive bullpen rotation—functional but not impactful. His strikeout volume relative to innings pitched reflects below-average velocity or command stability, which tracks with the broader narrative that Clarke's value lies in durability and availability rather than dominant stuff. The media framing around Clarke's signing hinges on a mechanical or approach adjustment that could elevate his effectiveness, yet the early-season numbers haven't yet validated that optimism; his current output sits squarely in the serviceable-innings category, the kind of performance that doesn't hurt a pitching staff but doesn't meaningfully improve it either. Within the context of the Diamondbacks' aggressive late-May and early-June roster additions—including a flurry of position player signings—Clarke's role is clear: a low-cost insurance policy on the bullpen while the front office attempts to patch holes on a team clawing back toward .500. As long as he continues to eat innings without imploding, the goodwill built on his contract efficiency should hold, but his performance grade reflects that he's operating well within his established ceiling as a replacement-caliber depth piece, not the upside breakout the optimistic headlines are speculating about.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Taylor's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Taylor Clarke ranks 270th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Taylor between Zak Kent (C) just ahead and Yaramil Hiraldo (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Zak KentNationalsCChris MurphyWhite SoxCRyan WeissAstrosCGraded lower
Yaramil HiraldoOrioles| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/9 | @ MIA | L 6-10 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs LAD | L 0-7 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Taylor Clarke is a player in his 6th MLB season listed at RP for the Diamondbacks. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Taylor Clarke, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance C, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 51 |
| 3.25 |
| 1-1 |
| 44 |
| 0.85 |
| 55.1 |
| 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 58 | 5.95 | 3-6 | 65 | 1.61 | 59.0 | 3 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 47 | 4.04 | 3-1 | 48 | 1.18 | 49.0 | 3 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 43 | 4.98 | 1-3 | 39 | 1.52 | 43.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 12 | 4.36 | 3-0 | 40 | 1.29 | 43.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 23 | 5.31 | 5-5 | 68 | 1.37 | 84.2 | 1 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.