
#34 RP · Braves
Height
6'3"
Weight
214 lbs
Age
32
College
N/A
Experience
7 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Joel Payamps
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Joel Payamps grades out as a middling RP for Braves (C+ Performance). That places him 249th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 261 | 3.545783 | 14-24 | 253 | 1.1927711 | 0.0 | 10 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 12 | 8.22 | 0-2 | 9 | 1.70 | 7.2 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$1.4M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Stacked against the RP field, Joel Payamps grades out at a C+ performance level for the Braves. Through 12 games in the 2026 season, Payamps has accumulated 9 strikeouts with no wins, a workload pattern consistent with a middle-relief specialist tasked with eating innings rather than closing high-leverage spots—exactly the role Atlanta has carved out for him. His calling card as an established veteran has been the ability to generate weak contact and provide depth relief without inflicting damage, and while the strikeout rate on limited opportunities doesn't scream dominance, it reflects the modest but functional output expected of a 32-year-old reliever in his eighth professional season. The gap between his B sentiment grade and C+ performance grade is instructive: Payamps has built genuine goodwill by delivering in visible moments (notably sealing a six-game winning streak for the club), earning organizational trust reflected in a $2.25M one-year re-signing after an earlier designation-for-assignment scare, but the broader statistical profile remains above-average rather than elite. With the Braves holding the NL East's top seed and actively reshuffling their pitching depth—adding multiple relief arms including Hurston Waldrep, Tyler Kinley, and Carlos Carrasco over the past weeks—Payamps' role security is contingent on maintaining consistency; his performance grade reflects a player who stabilizes a crowded bullpen rather than transforms it, and in a front-office climate favoring aggressive upgrades, his standing is more fragile than his recent positive narrative suggests.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Joel's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Joel Payamps ranks 249th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Joel between Hunter Bigge (C+) just ahead and Chris Murphy (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Hunter BiggeRaysC+JOE MantiplyBlue JaysC+Rolddy MunozBravesC+Graded lower
Chris MurphyWhite SoxAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Joel Payamps is a player in his 7th MLB season listed at RP for the Braves. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Joel Payamps, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C+, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 28 |
| 7.23 |
| 0-1 |
| 22 |
| 1.61 |
| 23.2 |
| 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 2 | 3.38 | 0-0 | 2 | 0.75 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2025 | 30 | 6.84 | 0-1 | 24 | 1.52 | 26.1 | 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 68 | 3.05 | 3-7 | 59 | 0.97 | 59.0 | 6 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 69 | 2.55 | 7-5 | 77 | 1.05 | 70.2 | 3 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 29 | 3.16 | 2-3 | 33 | 1.45 | 42.2 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 12 | 3.46 | 1-3 | 8 | 1.08 | 13.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 41 | 3.23 | 3-6 | 41 | 1.37 | 55.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 22 | 2.70 | 0-2 | 22 | 1.07 | 30.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 4.43 | 1-1 | 16 | 1.28 | 20.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 37 | 3.40 | 1-3 | 38 | 1.15 | 50.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 2 | 3.00 | 0-0 | 2 | 1.67 | 3.0 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 2 | 4.50 | 0-0 | 3 | 1.75 | 4.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.