
#81 RP · Diamondbacks
Height
6'5"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
33
College
N/A
Draft
2014, Rd 23, #676
Experience
6 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Ryan Thompson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Ryan Thompson grades out as a strong RP for Diamondbacks (B+ Performance). That places him 107th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B+, good value. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 277 | 3.5141752 | 20-17 | 220 | 1.1791238 | 0.0 | 8 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 26 | 2.53 | 2-1 | 14 | 1.22 | 21.1 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$4.0M
Guaranteed
$2.4M
AAV
$4.0M/yr
Ryan Thompson delivers the kind of production that earns a B+ performance grade against MLB RP comps. The 2026 season shows him posting 2 wins and 14 strikeouts across 26 games, marking solid depth-reliever production from a 33-year-old arm that hasn't lost its edge. His strikeout rate represents his clearest statistical strength—consistent swing-and-miss stuff that keeps hitters honest in late-inning spots. The modest win total underscores the familiar reliever trap: counting wins depend on run support and bullpen sequencing, not pure stuff, so that number says less about his actual value than his ability to stay on the mound. Thompson's durability across 26 games shows a workhorse mentality befitting a seven-year veteran; he's been available and trusted in the role the Diamondbacks need filled. Narratively, his clubhouse leadership and faith-focused approach have earned genuine respect in Arizona's locker room, though media attention has stayed muted—partly because the front office has cycled through multiple roster additions over the past week, and partly because a 33-year-old reliever rarely commands sustained spotlight regardless of performance. With Arizona sitting at .500 and the playoffs 113 days away, Thompson's steady, unspectacular utility in the bullpen makes him exactly the kind of veteran anchor a contender can rely on without fanfare.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Ryan's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Ryan Thompson ranks 107th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Ryan between Isaac Mattson (B+) just ahead and Jacob Webb (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Isaac MattsonPiratesB+Brycen MautzCardinalsB+Yovanny CruzYankeesB+Graded lower
Jacob WebbCubs| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | vs LAA | L 0-7 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ MIA | L 6-10 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Ryan Thompson is a player in his 6th MLB season listed at RP for the Diamondbacks. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Ryan Thompson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance B+, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 48 |
| 3.92 |
| 3-2 |
| 36 |
| 1.33 |
| 41.1 |
| 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 67 | 3.26 | 7-5 | 52 | 1.19 | 66.1 | 2 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 18 | 6.11 | 1-2 | 12 | 1.19 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 13 | 0.69 | 0-0 | 9 | 0.54 | 13.0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 31 | 3.82 | 1-2 | 21 | 0.91 | 30.2 | 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 47 | 3.80 | 3-3 | 39 | 1.17 | 42.2 | 3 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 36 | 2.38 | 3-2 | 37 | 1.03 | 34.0 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 25 | 4.44 | 1-2 | 23 | 1.41 | 26.1 | 1 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/4 | vs LAD | L 0-7 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |