
RP · Orioles
Grade Nick Raquet
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Nick Raquet grades out as a middling RP for Orioles (C+ Performance). That places him 239th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 5 | 5.785714 | 0-0 | 2 | 1.2857144 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 3 | 10.13 | 0-0 | 1 | 1.88 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 2 | 0.00 |
The C+ performance grade on Nick Raquet reflects above-replacement-caliber talent alongside the significant production limitations that define a depth-level arm. In limited 2026 season action—three games with one strikeout—Raquet has not generated the counting stats to move the needle, a reality that aligns with his trajectory as a second-year player still working to establish consistency at the big-league level. His best case remains modest: the strikeout suggests he has some swing-and-miss stuff in the arsenal, but a 0-1 record across minimal appearances tells you everything about his current standing in the bullpen hierarchy. As a depth piece on a rookie scale contract, Raquet profiles as organizational insurance—the kind of arm you elevate from Triple-A when injuries or inefficiency force your hand, not the kind you build around. The Cardinals' willingness to move him, combined with Baltimore's recent pattern of cycling through a steady stream of relief signings and prospect swaps, frames this acquisition squarely as roster filler in a season where the Orioles are fighting to stay relevant in a crowded division. At this stage of his career, Raquet's ceiling is a reliable long-relief or mop-up option; his floor is a permanent Triple-A fixture.
Public sentiment around Nick Raquet sits at the low end of the grading scale, and frankly, the reaction is warranted given the circumstances of this acquisition. The dominant narrative frames this as a low-ceiling depth move with minimal immediate impact — Raquet's history of yo-yoing between Triple-A and the majors paints him clearly as a roster-fringe arm, and the fact that St. Louis ultimately moved on from him signals the Cardinals saw little long-term value in keeping him around. His performance grade tells a slightly more charitable story, landing in above-replacement territory, but that modest production floor does nothing to alter the perception that he profiles as organizational insurance rather than a genuine bullpen contributor. The broader context of Baltimore's recent roster churn makes it harder for any single move to generate enthusiasm — the Orioles have cycled through a steady stream of signings and roster shuffles over the past week, reinforcing the image of a club patching holes rather than making meaningful upgrades. The headline that generated the most genuine engagement was the human-interest angle on Raquet abandoning a finance career to chase a big-league dream, which is a compelling personal story but does little to reframe his standing as a back-end depth piece. With Baltimore sitting at 16-20 and outside the playoff picture in the American League East, fan patience for filler transactions is understandably thin. The narrative here is settled: a serviceable Triple-A safety net, nothing more.
Nick Raquet ranks 239th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Nick between Cody Laweryson (C+) just ahead and Joel Payamps (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Cody LawerysonTwinsC+Elvis AlvaradoAthleticsC+Tyler KinleyBravesC+Graded lower
Joel PayampsBravesAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Nick Raquet is a player on the Orioles roster listed at RP for the Orioles. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Nick Raquet, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance C+, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0-0 |
| 1 |
| 0.50 |
| 2.0 |
| 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.