
#37 RP · Diamondbacks
Height
6'4"
Weight
235 lbs
Age
32
College
Southwestern University
Draft
2016, Rd 22, #659
Experience
7 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Kevin Ginkel
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kevin Ginkel grades out as a strong RP for Diamondbacks (B+ Performance). That places him 107th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B+, good value. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 295 | 3.762295 | 23-14 | 313 | 1.2540984 | 0.0 | 16 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 28 | 2.81 | 1-2 | 30 | 1.05 | 25.2 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.7M
Guaranteed
$1.6M
AAV
$2.7M/yr
Diamondbacks got a B+ Contract Value Index out of the Kevin Ginkel signing because the $2.725M AAV maps to expected production from a veteran depth reliever with genuine talent. Ginkel's performance grade of B+ reflects real on-field competence—his return from injury and development of a new pitch have shown legitimate upside—but his contract value holds firm despite recent noise because the deal is priced to exploit organizational depth and volatility rather than betting on a full-time closer role. At $2.725M on a one-year deal, he's not carrying the salary burden of an entrenched veteran and doesn't lock Arizona into a multiyear commitment, which is exactly where a 32-year-old arm with usage uncertainty should land in the current market. The friction between his B+ performance and D+ sentiment—worsened by his recent demotion to the minors and replacement by Jeff Brigham—underscores the gap between what Ginkel can do and how much the Diamondbacks are willing to use him, but that disconnect doesn't invalidate the contract's value; it simply reflects roster construction volatility in a bullpen short on left-handed depth. With Arizona sitting at .500 and outside the playoff picture at this stage of the season, Ginkel's path back to stability hinges entirely on proving he can hold a roster spot consistently—until then, the CVI remains anchored to his demonstrable ability rather than organizational confidence, which is exactly how a low-risk, low-AAV deal should function.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Kevin's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kevin Ginkel ranks 107th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Kevin between Isaac Mattson (B+) just ahead and Jacob Webb (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Isaac MattsonPiratesB+Brycen MautzCardinalsB+Yovanny CruzYankeesB+Graded lower
Jacob WebbCubs| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/9 | @ MIA | L 6-10 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs LAD | L 5-6 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kevin Ginkel is a player in his 7th MLB season listed at RP for the Diamondbacks. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kevin Ginkel, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance B+, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 29 |
| 7.36 |
| 1-4 |
| 29 |
| 1.64 |
| 25.2 |
| 3 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 72 | 3.21 | 8-3 | 77 | 1.20 | 70.0 | 5 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 60 | 2.48 | 9-1 | 70 | 0.98 | 65.1 | 4 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 30 | 3.38 | 1-1 | 30 | 1.30 | 29.1 | 1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 32 | 6.35 | 0-1 | 31 | 1.55 | 28.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 19 | 6.75 | 0-2 | 18 | 2.13 | 16.0 | 1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 25 | 1.48 | 3-0 | 28 | 0.99 | 24.1 | 2 |
Kevin Ginkel delivers the kind of production that earns a B+ performance grade against MLB RP comps. The 2026 season shows 30 strikeouts across 28 games — solid pitch-execution metrics for a late-inning arm operating in a middle-relief or high-leverage setup role. His early-season return from injury and successful integration of a new pitch demonstrate technical competency and willingness to evolve his arsenal, which is the hallmark of a craftsman reliever rather than a thrower coasting on fastball dominance. Yet the production hasn't translated to organizational confidence: a recent demotion to the minors and subsequent replacement by Jeff Brigham reads as a clear signal that despite his on-field ability, Arizona views him as a depth piece rather than a stable contributor in a pennant chase. At 32 and in his eighth season as an established veteran, Ginkel sits in a precarious position — the talent-to-deployment gap is real, and with the Diamondbacks clinging to .500 baseball and outside the playoff frame, there's no patience for bullpen experimentation or roster flux. Until he secures and holds a stable spot in the active bullpen, the narrative remains one of unrealized potential masking deeper organizational doubts about his role and durability in high-leverage situations down the stretch.
Kevin Ginkel's public narrative sits in murky territory right now — a D+ sentiment that has clawed back from worse depths over the past 30 days, but still reflects a fanbase and media environment that isn't sure what to make of him. The dominant storyline is a classic mixed signal: genuine optimism surrounding his return from injury and the development of a new pitch coexists uncomfortably with the hard reality that he was sent down to the minors and replaced on the active roster by Jeff Brigham, which is rarely a confidence-building headline. That demotion is the loudest piece of noise drowning out the comeback arc, and it frames him squarely as a depth piece rather than a reliever Arizona can count on in meaningful situations. What makes this friction particularly interesting is that his performance grade sits at a legitimately solid B+ — there's real on-field evidence that the talent is there, but the organization's deployment decisions are telling a different story to the outside world. The broader Arizona bullpen conversation isn't helping either; the team's lack of left-handed relief options has become a public talking point, and questions about who will close games are keeping the spotlight on bullpen instability rather than individual success stories. With the Diamondbacks sitting at .500 and outside the playoff picture at 17-17, there's little margin for the narrative around bullpen construction to feel patient or optimistic. Until Ginkel earns a stable roster spot and holds it, the public perception gap between his actual ability and his perceived role is going to remain wide.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.