
#59 RP · Yankees
Height
6'3"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
30
College
UCLA
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Jake Bird
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jake Bird grades out as a middling RP for Yankees (C- Performance). That places him 305th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 213 | 4.7816243 | 12-12 | 236 | 1.4620507 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 22 | 5.00 | 1-1 | 20 | 1.33 | 18.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$975K
Guaranteed
$585K
AAV
$975K/yr
The C- performance grade on Jake Bird reflects MVP-caliber peaks alongside cooler stretches. Bird's 2026 season numbers tell the story of a pitcher treading water rather than commanding leverage: across 22 games, he's logged just 1 win with 20 strikeouts, the kind of middling counting stats that typify a low-leverage, depth-driven role. The strikeout rate is his primary asset—a reminder that the raw stuff remains intact—but a single win across 22 appearances signals both limited opportunity and minimal impact when opportunities do materialize. At 30 years old and five seasons into his career, Bird is functioning as organizational depth rather than a credible relief option; the frequency of games pitched (22) coupled with the anemic win total suggests he's cycling between the active roster and Triple-A without establishing himself as trustworthy in tight spots. The media narrative has been unsparing: framed as a "placeholder" and the "most boring route possible" for bullpen reinforcement, Bird's presence on a 41-26 Yankees roster competing for postseason positioning reads as an indictment of front office urgency rather than a vote of confidence in his ability to deliver when stakes matter. Unless a dramatic performance shift forces a reevaluation, Bird will finish this stretch-run role as low-leverage insurance—useful for eating innings against weaker opponents, but unlikely to earn meaningful playoff exposure or reshape how the front office views its relief corps heading into autumn.
Jake Bird ranks 305th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Jake between Keaton Winn (C) just ahead and Brandon LeIbrandt (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Keaton WinnGiantsCJayden MurrayAstrosCAndrew MorrisTwinsCGraded lower
Brandon LeIbrandtReds| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 6/14 | @ TOR | W 8-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ CLE | W 3-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jake Bird is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at RP for the Yankees. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jake Bird, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance C-, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 45 |
| 4.73 |
| 4-1 |
| 62 |
| 1.48 |
| 53.1 |
| 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 27.00 | 0-1 | 4 | 3.00 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 48 | 5.53 | 4-2 | 66 | 1.54 | 55.1 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 35 | 4.50 | 2-2 | 31 | 1.70 | 40.0 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 70 | 4.33 | 3-3 | 77 | 1.35 | 89.1 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 38 | 4.91 | 2-4 | 42 | 1.43 | 47.2 | 0 |
Jake Bird's public standing with Yankees fans has cratered to near-rock-bottom levels, and the frustration is entirely understandable given what this situation represents. The media narrative surrounding his roster status has been brutally dismissive — coverage has largely framed his presence as the "most boring route possible," painting him as a bullpen placeholder rather than a genuine weapon, and that framing has stuck with a fanbase that expected more aggressive upgrades in the relief corps. On the field, Bird's production grades out as middling at best, which makes the optics worse: he's not a reclamation story generating excitement, he's a depth piece cycling between the active roster and Triple-A without ever commanding trust in high-leverage moments. The franchise's recent moves — extensions for core names like Gerrit Cole, Anthony Volpe, Luis Gil, and Giancarlo Stanton's IL situation — have only amplified the scrutiny on the bullpen's supporting cast, because fans can see the team is managing major pieces while Bird continues to serve as low-leverage insurance. Headlines have oscillated between optimism (spring reports of him looking "nasty," flashes of closing out wins with key outs) and reality checks (multiple demotions, a deadline-trade return that disappointed), which produces exactly the kind of whiplash narrative that erodes confidence. The bottom line is that Bird enters this stretch of the regular season as one of the most skeptically viewed pieces on a 25-11 club, and unless performance forces a re-evaluation, the narrative of "organizational stopgap" will define his tenure in pinstripes.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Mon, 6/8 | @ CLE | W 7-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |