
#50 RP · Reds
Height
5'9"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
34
College
Memphis
Draft
2013, Rd 3, #77
Experience
6 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Sam Moll
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Sam Moll grades out as a middling RP for Reds (C- Performance). That places him 309th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 236 | 3.6510851 | 9-9 | 209 | 1.2671118 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 29 | 2.39 | 1-3 | 28 | 1.06 | 26.1 | 1 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$875K
Guaranteed
$525K
AAV
$875K/yr
Stacked against the RP field, Sam Moll grades out at a C- performance level for the Reds. At 34 years old and seven seasons into his career, Moll functions as a reliable but unspectacular depth reliever — the kind of organizational filler who earns his roster spot through organizational trust and situational utility rather than statistical dominance. His 2026 season shows 28 strikeouts across 29 games, a respectable strike-thrower's count that reflects his role as a left-handed specialist without suggesting he's outpacing peer expectations at the back of the bullpen. The one win on his ledger is modest production for a reliever mid-season, consistent with a pitcher deployed in lower-leverage spots who functions best against specific matchups rather than as a high-volume contributor. Cincinnati's recent bullpen additions — including Chase Petty, Rhett Lowder, Brandon Leibrandt, and Yunior Marte — have arrived in quick succession, which subtly pressures Moll's standing despite the front office's stated confidence in his re-signing; in a crowded relief corps, a quiet depth arm without a loud statistical profile is always vulnerable when the team's performance demands difficult roster decisions. The media narrative frames him as a potential hidden asset whose value may be underappreciated, but that framing remains theoretical until he converts modest contributions into demonstrable impact as the Reds chase postseason relevance over the remaining 107 days of the regular season.
Sam Moll ranks 309th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Sam between Josh Fleming (C-) just ahead and Craig Yoho (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Josh FlemingBlue JaysC-Justin BruihlCardinalsC-Keegan AkinOriolesC-Graded lower
Craig YohoBrewers| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | vs NYM | W 5-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sun, 6/14 | vs ARI | L 3-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Sam Moll is a player in his 6th MLB season listed at RP for the Reds. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Sam Moll, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance C-, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 23 |
| 6.38 |
| 1-0 |
| 22 |
| 1.42 |
| 18.1 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 48 | 3.35 | 3-2 | 38 | 1.09 | 37.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 45 | 4.54 | 0-3 | 46 | 1.41 | 37.2 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 25 | 0.73 | 2-0 | 22 | 0.97 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | 70 | 3.03 | 2-3 | 68 | 1.24 | 62.1 | 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 53 | 2.91 | 2-1 | 46 | 1.27 | 43.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 8 | 3.48 | 0-0 | 8 | 1.26 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 11 | 10.80 | 0-0 | 7 | 2.40 | 6.2 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Wed, 6/10 | @ SD | W 5-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sun, 6/7 | @ STL | L 3-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ STL | L 5-6 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |