
#4 RF · Rangers
Height
5'10"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
39
College
N/A
Draft
2005, Rd 1, #11
Experience
17 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Andrew McCutchen
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Andrew McCutchen grades out as a middling RF for Rangers (C Performance). That places him 49th of 74 graded right fielders. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 17+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 2299 | 0.2706874 | 333 | 1157 | 0.81938016 | 220 | 2280 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 37 | .192 | 1 | 5 | .537 | 0 | 14 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
Guaranteed
$750K
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Tape review and advanced metrics converge on a C performance grade for Andrew McCutchen. At 39 years old and operating on a minor-league deal, McCutchen is performing at a below-average clip relative to position standards — his 2026 season line of .192 AVG, 1 HR, and 22 K across 37 games reflects the inevitable decline of a player well into his late career stage, even one with Hall of Fame credentials. The singular bright spot is sporadic power production, though one home run over 37 games is hardly a foundation for impact. He's logging meaningful playing time as a depth piece and veteran presence rather than a cornerstone contributor, functioning more as a clubhouse stabilizer than an offensive engine. McCutchen's narrative arc — celebrated elder statesman with a storied resume that includes an NL MVP, four Silver Sluggers, a Gold Glove, and the Roberto Clemente Award — has decoupled from his on-field output, which is exactly where the media and fanbase have recalibrated expectations for an 18-year veteran. The Rangers' recent roster activity shows a team actively competing mid-stretch-run, and while McCutchen's C-grade production isn't driving that effort, his presence as a respected veteran and occasional highlight contributor carries intangible value that transcends his batting line.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Andrew's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Andrew McCutchen ranks 49th of 74 graded right fielders by performance. That slots Andrew between Rob Refsnyder (C+) just ahead and John Rave (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Rob RefsnyderMarinersC+Mickey MoniakRockiesC+Kerry CarpenterTigersC+Graded lower
John RaveRoyalsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Andrew McCutchen is a veteran in his 17th MLB season listed at RF for the Rangers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Andrew McCutchen, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 135 |
| .239 |
| 13 |
| 57 |
| .700 |
| 1 |
| 114 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 120 | .232 | 20 | 50 | .739 | 3 | 104 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 112 | .256 | 12 | 43 | .775 | 11 | 100 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 134 | .237 | 17 | 69 | .700 | 8 | 122 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 144 | .222 | 27 | 80 | .778 | 6 | 107 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 57 | .253 | 10 | 34 | .757 | 4 | 55 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 59 | .256 | 10 | 29 | .835 | 2 | 56 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 130 | .255 | 15 | 55 | .772 | 13 | 123 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 25 | .253 | 5 | 10 | .892 | 1 | 22 |
| 2018 | 155 | .255 | 20 | 65 | .792 | 14 | 145 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 156 | .279 | 28 | 88 | .849 | 11 | 159 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 153 | .256 | 24 | 79 | .766 | 6 | 153 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 157 | .292 | 23 | 96 | .889 | 11 | 165 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 146 | .314 | 25 | 83 | .952 | 18 | 172 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 157 | .317 | 21 | 84 | .912 | 27 | 185 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 157 | .327 | 31 | 96 | .953 | 20 | 194 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 158 | .259 | 23 | 89 | .820 | 23 | 148 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 154 | .286 | 16 | 56 | .814 | 33 | 163 |
| 2009 | ![]() | 108 | .286 | 12 | 54 | .836 | 22 | 124 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.