
#12 RF · Dodgers
Height
5'11"
Weight
189 lbs
Age
31
College
Ball State
Draft
2016, Rd 3, #86
Experience
4 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Alex Call
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Alex Call grades out as a middling RF for Dodgers (C Performance). That places him 54th of 74 graded right fielders. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 340 | 0.24532454 | 21 | 106 | 0.71634614 | 19 | 223 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 32 | .288 | 0 | 13 | .764 | 0 | 19 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.6M
Guaranteed
$960K
AAV
$1.6M/yr
Alex Call produces at a tier that grades a C performance mark for the Dodgers. His 2026 season line of .288 AVG across 32 games reflects a contact-oriented profile with solid batting average but minimal power upside—a depth outfielder's production template rather than an everyday contributor's. The batting average represents his statistical strength, but that ceiling is offset by an absence of home-run production and a strikeout rate (9 K in 32 games) that suggests limited impact in high-leverage spots. As a role player deployed in a limited capacity, Call is receiving regular opportunities but remains a fourth or fifth outfield option whose value hinges on defensive reliability and occasional clutch at-bats rather than sustained offensive production. His storyline carries genuine goodwill—a World Series contributor whose grinder identity and timely baserunning moments have earned disproportionate media affection—but the performance data shows a real gap between narrative and box-score reality. With the Dodgers actively reshaping their roster through recent roster moves and signings, Call faces competitive pressure to close that gap; for now, he remains a serviceable depth piece whose perception is healthier than his on-field output strictly justifies.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Alex's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Alex Call ranks 54th of 74 graded right fielders by performance. That slots Alex between Rece Hinds (C) just ahead and Ryan Vilade (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Rece HindsRedsCOwen CaissieMarlinsCJohn RaveRoyalsCGraded lower
Ryan ViladeRays| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | vs TB | W 1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs TB | W 4-3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Alex Call is a player in his 4th MLB season listed at RF for the Dodgers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Alex Call, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 72 |
| .274 |
| 3 |
| 26 |
| .757 |
| 1 |
| 54 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 38 | .247 | 2 | 5 | .717 | 1 | 18 |
| 2025 | 110 | .267 | 5 | 31 | .746 | 2 | 72 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 30 | .343 | 3 | 14 | .950 | 5 | 34 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 128 | .200 | 8 | 38 | .614 | 9 | 75 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 12 | .167 | 0 | — | .542 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 35 | .245 | 5 | 13 | .771 | 3 | 25 |
| 2022 | 47 | .237 | 5 | 13 | .748 | 3 | 27 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/11 | @ PIT | W 8-6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/10 | @ PIT | L 8-9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ PIT | W 12-3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun, 6/7 | vs LAA | W 9-2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs LAA | W 1-0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ ARI | L 2-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ ARI | W 7-0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Wed, 6/3 | @ ARI | W 6-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |