
#49 RP · Braves
Height
6'3"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
32
College
Nebraska
Draft
2014, Rd 19, #558
Experience
9 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Aaron Bummer
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Aaron Bummer grades out as a strong RP for Braves (B Performance). That places him 150th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 406 | 3.9445844 | 22-21 | 442 | 1.3350126 | 0.0 | 5 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 19 | 7.63 | 1-1 | 13 | 1.83 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$13.0M
Guaranteed
$7.8M
AAV
$6.5M/yr
Aaron Bummer's on-field production earns a B performance grade against RP peers across MLB. When he takes the mound, he is an above-average reliever capable of executing high-leverage innings, and the grade reflects legitimate competence in his primary role — the on-field results themselves are not the problem. The central issue is durability: Bummer is currently on the 15-day injured list, a placement that arrives on the heels of an already-simmering availability concern that has now crystallized into a franchise liability at $6.5M salary. For an established 32-year-old veteran, the expectation is consistency and health, and an IL stint mid-season undercuts both — particularly for a club sitting atop the National League East at 42-21, where roster depth matters but a high-priced pitcher throwing in a training program rather than pitching games is an inefficient use of payroll flexibility. The Braves' recent aggressive restocking of the pitching staff (multiple arms signed or acquired over the past two weeks) suggests the front office has already hedged against Bummer's unreliability, which is a tacit acknowledgment that his talent alone cannot overcome his injury track record. Until he demonstrates he can string together a consistent stretch of availability down the stretch, Bummer remains stuck in an uncomfortable middle ground: capable when healthy, but increasingly difficult to rely on or defend when health itself is the perpetual question mark.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Aaron's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Aaron Bummer ranks 150th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Aaron between Franco Aleman (B) just ahead and Steven Matz (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Franco AlemanGuardiansBTommy KahnleRed SoxBJack AndersonRed SoxBGraded lower
Steven MatzRaysAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Aaron Bummer is a veteran in his 9th MLB season listed at RP for the Braves. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Aaron Bummer, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 42 |
| 3.81 |
| 3-2 |
| 51 |
| 1.25 |
| 54.1 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 56 | 3.58 | 4-3 | 69 | 1.43 | 55.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 61 | 6.79 | 5-5 | 78 | 1.53 | 58.1 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 32 | 2.36 | 2-1 | 30 | 1.50 | 26.2 | 2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 62 | 3.51 | 5-5 | 75 | 1.26 | 56.1 | 2 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 9 | 0.96 | 1-0 | 14 | 1.07 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 58 | 2.13 | 0-0 | 60 | 0.99 | 67.2 | 1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 37 | 4.26 | 0-1 | 35 | 1.58 | 31.2 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 30 | 4.50 | 1-3 | 17 | 1.27 | 22.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.