Roster grades based on player Performance, with a crowd-voted Fan Verdict.
Team grades roll up from the roster's player grades. WNBA Performance is graded on per-game box production relative to position.
12
Players
9
Graded
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Grade the Las Vegas Aces
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
The Las Vegas Aces' roster construction earns a C Contract Value Index (CVI), reflecting a portfolio that sits squarely in the middle band—neither exceptional value nor problematic overspending, but rather a measured, middle-of-the-road approach to salary allocation. Across the six graded contracts, there are zero standout value deals and zero identifiable overpays, which tells you the front office has largely stayed in the neutral zone: fair-market compensation without the leverage to extract steals or the recklessness to hand out bloated deals. This even distribution suggests a front office playing it straight—neither aggressively hunting bargains nor leaving money on the table, which under the WNBA's hard-cap structure can be either prudent or a missed opportunity depending on roster construction philosophy. With six of twelve roster spots graded, the CVI assessment covers half the active roster, meaning the ungraded half likely consists of minimum-salary depth pieces or developmental players filling out the bench. That middle-ground CVI grade implies the Aces have sufficient cap discipline to remain solvent and flexible, but lack the contract architecture—exceptional value on star talent or veteran minimum steals—that separate contending WNBA rosters from the pack. Going forward, the franchise's ability to add talent depth or retain rotation players will depend less on clever cap maneuvering and more on maintaining this neutral-value baseline while extracting on-court performance from fairly-priced core contributors.