Roster grades based on player Performance, with a crowd-voted Fan Verdict.
Team grades roll up from the roster's player grades. WNBA Performance is graded on per-game box production relative to position.
15
Players
11
Graded
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Grade the Golden State Valkyries
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
The Golden State Valkyries earn a C Contract Value Index (CVI) — a middling portfolio grade that reflects inconsistent roster construction and limited margin for error under the league's hard-cap constraints. Of nine graded contracts, the front office has struck zero good-value deals while committing to at least one clear overpay, meaning roughly one-in-nine dollars spent on this roster is working against competitive efficiency. That's a below-average hit rate, particularly in a league where salary flexibility is razor-thin and every roster spot carries acute opportunity cost. With nine of fifteen roster spots evaluated, the Valkyries have graded roughly 60 percent of their payroll; the remaining six ungraded contracts will largely determine whether this portfolio tilts toward competitiveness or further value destruction. The absence of any genuine bargains suggests the front office has either overpaid for marginal talent across the board or failed to identify cap-efficient contributors — neither posture builds sustainable rosters in the WNBA's salary environment. Moving forward, the Valkyries cannot afford to repeat this spending pattern; turning the CVI around will require finding at least one or two anchor-value contracts in future windows, because neutral or negative value across most of the roster leaves almost no room for championship-window thinking.