Roster grades based on player Performance, with a crowd-voted Fan Verdict.
Team grades roll up from the roster's player grades. WNBA Performance is graded on per-game box production relative to position.
14
Players
10
Graded
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Grade the Chicago Sky
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
The Chicago Sky earns a C+ Contract Value Index (CVI), a middling assessment that reflects a roster construction strategy caught between competing priorities. Of the six graded contracts on the team's 14-player roster, zero represent genuine value opportunities while one stands out as a clear overpay—a distribution that signals inconsistent roster discipline rather than systematic underspending or savvy deal-making. That ratio (zero good deals, one overpay among six graded deals) suggests the front office has been neither aggressive in hunting undervalued talent nor reckless across the board; instead, it points to a roster where most signings cluster near market rate with one misstep pulling down the aggregate value. With only 43 percent of the roster graded on the CVI spectrum, the unanalyzed eight contracts remain a wildcard—they could conceal additional value, additional overpays, or a mix of both. Under the WNBA's hard salary cap, the team has limited flexibility to absorb the cost of that one overpay without offsetting moves elsewhere, making future roster decisions higher-stakes than in leagues with tax-based spending. The C+ verdict implies that while the Sky have avoided catastrophic spending mistakes, they've also missed opportunities to build a more efficient roster; sustained improvement will require smarter contract discipline going forward.