GM: Mickey Loomis
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
106
Players
45
Transactions
102
Players Graded
*(53 active roster + 16 practice squad + IR/PUP/reserve lists)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the New Orleans Saints the same way it covers every NFL franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the New Orleans Saints, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance F, Sentiment F. Front office leadership: Mickey Loomis.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 102 of 106 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The NFL team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the New Orleans Saints
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, New Orleans Saints is getting good value for the money (B- Contract Value Index). That ranks 17th of 32 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a roster among the league’s thinnest (F Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The New Orleans Saints' roster construction earns a B- Contract Value Index (CVI), reflecting a portfolio caught between disciplined value-hunting and costly missteps that limit cap flexibility heading into the offseason. Of 39 total roster spots, the Saints have graded 36 contracts, yielding a stark divide: just four deals qualify as genuinely good value, while five represent clear overpays that weigh on the cap sheet during a critical rebuild window. Linebacker represents the lone bright spot in positional value, where the team has found efficient deals, whereas the wide receiver group has become a drag—contracts there are outpacing production and market rate, a particular concern given the 6-11 record and #13 NFC seed positioning. With 92% of the roster covered by the CVI grading, there's high confidence in this assessment; the Saints front office has been selective in creating value but inconsistent in avoiding anchor deals that limit their ability to pivot. The ratio of overpays to good-value signings suggests a lack of disciplined cap management across the board—this is a team that needs to reset through free agency and the draft, not defend expensive commitments to underperforming position groups.
The New Orleans Saints are operating with a bottom-feeder roster that offers virtually no foundation for competitive football. Of the 39 players on the active roster, only 29 earned grades, and that cohort breaks down into a deeply concerning distribution: zero elite-tier players, just five starters, eight rotation-level contributors, and sixteen depth pieces—a top-heavy concentration at the bottom that betrays chronic talent scarcity across the board. The linebacker room represents the only identifiable strength, a narrow bright spot in an otherwise barren landscape. The quarterback position is an outright disaster, serving as the single greatest liability and the primary reason this roster cannot function at a professional level. With the Saints sitting at 6-11 and firmly out of playoff contention, and with no meaningful defensive or offensive tier data to suggest either side is carrying the load, this is a rebuild-from-the-ground-up scenario: no elite talent, no proven starters beyond a handful, and not enough depth continuity to weather injuries or execute a coherent game plan. The path forward demands multiple offseasons of acquisition and development before this franchise can realistically field a competitive team.
New Orleans Saints ranks 17th of 32 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the Minnesota Vikings (B) just ahead and the Los Angeles Rams (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Minnesota VikingsBLas Vegas RaidersBChicago BearsBGraded lower
Los Angeles RamsC+# New Orleans Saints: Offseason Sentiment Analysis The New Orleans fanbase is in a dark place right now, and frankly, the front office's offseason moves have done little to inspire confidence heading into a critical rebuild window. Of the 28 total transactions this offseason, only 10 drew positive reactions from fans and media, while 11 landed in mixed territory and 7 drew outright criticism — a ratio that tells you the market is far more skeptical than encouraged. The bright spot was Nick Saldiveri's addition, which earned an A+ grade and represented a rare consensus win, but that single home-run move cannot offset the broader narrative of organizational uncertainty. By contrast, the Jeremiah McClendon decision tanked to an F grade, becoming a lightning rod for frustration and symbolizing what many perceive as questionable roster-building priorities. With the team sitting at 6-11 and already out of playoff contention in the South, the prevailing sentiment is one of resigned frustration rather than hopeful patience — fans are waiting to see if the front office has a coherent vision, not betting that it does. Until the Saints demonstrate sustained discipline in the draft and free agency, the skepticism will persist.
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.